Check out the following:
318190 PRB: You Have to Reinstall the Windows 2000 Service Pack After You
Add
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=318190
292175 How to Perform an In-Place Upgrade of Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=292175
***
Terrence Tan
Server Setup Team
Please reply to the newsgroup and not directly to me.
This allows others to add to and benefit from these threads
and also helps to ensure a more timely response.
This posting is provided "AS IS" without warranty either
expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the
implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a
particular purpose.
The views and opinions expressed in this newsgroup posting
are mine and do not necessarily express or reflect the views
and/or opinions of Microsoft.
--------------------
<Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
<From: "Dan" <
[email protected]>
<Sender: "Dan" <
[email protected]>
<Subject: When to apply service pack?
<Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:17:45 -0700
<Lines: 11
<Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
<MIME-Version: 1.0
<Content-Type: text/plain;
< charset="iso-8859-1"
<Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
<Thread-Index: AcSkpSRCSlZtgC+kS1maEFXW1UnnMA==
<X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
<Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
<Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server:21441
<NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftngxa11.phx.gbl 10.40.1.163
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server
<
<When testing servers we typically use the same hard drives
<to test identical hardware of numerous systems. After
<testing a number of systems, the systems begin to run
<sluggish. Applying SP4 to the hard drives corrects this.
<
<I know with NT4 it was "when in doubt, reapply the service
<pack", but from what I've found on the web, W2K is not as
<picky, i.e. sp's for 2000 do not need to be reapplied.
<
<Can anyone point me to where I can find documentation as
<to when a 2000 service pack should be reapplied?
<
