WE KNOW WHO THE THIEF IS

[wheelman]

we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the right.too

 

[Frank]

wheelman, A REAL IDIOT wrote:

....are you really as stupid as you appear to be?
Frank

 

[Sal M'Nella]

we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
right.too

you are so full of crap you might as well run for President. If people
don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
ripping off people you idiot? I think you need to stop drinking.

Now go out and steal a car.

 

[Sal M'Nella]

wheelman, A REAL IDIOT wrote:

...are you really as stupid as you appear to be?
Frank

I think he is "STUPIDER" than he appears to be. I think he uses Ubuntu
also. Poor sap

 

[kurttrail]

If people
don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund. How is that
ripping off people you idiot?

Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

...are you really as stupid as you appear to be? Frank

That question mark should be a comma.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Mike Brannigan]

we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
right.too

Are you really this stupid ?

The potential release date for the next client OS after Vista (currently
referred to as Windows 7) is entirely in line with the well stated timelines
for Windows client OS release schedules.
No one is trying to"trash" Vista and release another OS.
What you and your fellow ....... seem to forget is that the exception to the
normal cycle was Windows Vista with a slightly longer development cycle.
Just look at the previous OS release dates and a later 2009 to 2010 release
for Windows "7" is completely acceptable and inline with plans. IN fact
you are getting your proverbial panties in a bunch only because Microsoft
are right back on track for a new client OS every 3 years (approx). ( You
may not remember that after Windows 2000 was release it was only a short
year and eight months to the arrival of Windows XP. I was around then ( and
long before that too) and remember all the nay sayers just like now whining
and bitching about Vista making all the same comments about XP.)
Face facts, as of right now Vista is already one and half years old since it
was released. Operating system development moves pretty fast maybe you
should get out of the slow lane.

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows NT 3.1 - July 1993
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994
Widnows NT 3.5 - September 1994
Windows NT 3.51 - May1995
Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows NT 4.0 - August 1996
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows 2000- February 2000
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows Server 2003 - April 2003
Windows XP 64-bit - 2003
Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs - July 2006
Windows Vista (Business Customers) - November 2006
Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007

 

[Sal M'Nella]

Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?

Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.

 

[kurttrail]

Does not apply to me because I get my Software for free.

So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."

Glad we got that straighten out!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

Are you really this stupid ?

The potential release date for the next client OS after Vista (currently
referred to as Windows 7) is entirely in line with the well stated
timelines for Windows client OS release schedules. No one is trying
to"trash" Vista and release another OS. What you and your fellow .......
seem to forget is that the exception to the normal cycle was Windows
Vista with a slightly longer development cycle. Just look at the
previous OS release dates and a later 2009 to 2010 release for Windows
"7" is completely acceptable and inline with plans. IN fact you are
getting your proverbial panties in a bunch only because Microsoft are
right back on track for a new client OS every 3 years (approx). ( You
may not remember that after Windows 2000 was release it was only a short
year and eight months to the arrival of Windows XP. I was around then (
and long before that too) and remember all the nay sayers just like now
whining and bitching about Vista making all the same comments about XP.)
Face facts, as of right now Vista is already one and half years old
since it was released. Operating system development moves pretty fast
maybe you should get out of the slow lane.

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows NT 3.1 - July 1993
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994 Widnows NT 3.5 - September
1994
Windows NT 3.51 - May1995
Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows NT 4.0 - August 1996
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows 2000- February 2000
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows Server 2003 - April 2003
Windows XP 64-bit - 2003
Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs - July 2006 Windows Vista (Business
Customers) - November 2006 Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January
2007

Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Chupacabra]

Most people get their copies of Windows from an OEM as part of a
computer. Have you tried to return an major OEM copy of Windows to MS?

Then he should just return the computer as it's obvious he's too stupid to
own one.

 

[Sal M'Nella]

So you didn't know what you were talking about when you said that "If
people don't want to use Vista then can return it for a refund."

Glad we got that straighten out!

I wasn't thinking about OEM versions. If you have issues with the OEM
version call the vendor and they should (in theory) help with problems and
straighten them out.

Thank GOD you are here to set the record straight.

 

[Don]

we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release
another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the
bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post
on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the
right.too

Really?

So you go to a hospital, see folks in pain and suffering, and then assume
everyone is in pain and suffering the same way?
Vista 64 bit, working very well for me.

 

[Mike Brannigan]

Now do that same timeline with only home-user OSs!

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994
Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows XP SP2 - August 2004 (worthy of mention as it was a major update and
introduced lots of app compat issues for vendors to resolve due ot the
hightened securoity improvements back ported from the Server 2003 dev tree)
{Also don't forget there were special purpose Home OEM versions such as the
Media Center Edition 2003,2004,2005}
Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007

As I said the only anomaly was the overly long Vista dev cycle - home users
were upgrading about every 2 years until the XP to Vista gap.
So again Jan 2007 to anytime 2009 would be fine for home users too.

 

[kurttrail]

I wasn't thinking
Obviously

about OEM versions. If you have issues with the OEM
version call the vendor and they should (in theory) help with problems
and straighten them out.

I don't need to return my non-MS OS.

Thank GOD you are here to set the record straight.

OK! God is great, isn't She?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Sal M'Nella]

I don't need to return my non-MS OS.


OK! God is great, isn't She?

That is pretty funny. When sometalks about GOD, I say the same thing. I
refer to GOD as her.

 

[Frank]

oh great moron wrote:

....why is it that you can't get your one little install of Vista to run
properly, huh?
Frank

 

[Adam Albright]

oh great moron wrote:

...why is it that you can't get your one little install of Vista to run
properly, huh?
Frank

Congratulations Frank! You've posted the same bullshit 10,000 times
now. To your unused and utterly undeveloped pea sized brain anyone
that has a Vista problem can't install Vista properly. That is your
standard response to everything. What a total klutz you always are.

BTW, when will you admit it was YOU that long ago told you needed to
call Microsoft and beg for help because you didn't know how to get
your copy of Vista working correctly.

 

[kurttrail]

Windows 1.0 - November 1985
Windows 2.0 - December 1987
Windows 3.0 - May 1990
Windows 3.1 - April 1992
Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - February 1994 Windows 95 - August 1995
Windows 95 OSR2 - October 1996
Windows 98 - June 1998
Windows 98SE- May 1999
Windows Me - July 2000
Windows XP - October 2001
Windows XP SP2 - August 2004 (worthy of mention as it was a major update
and introduced lots of app compat issues for vendors to resolve due ot
the hightened securoity improvements back ported from the Server 2003
dev tree) {Also don't forget there were special purpose Home OEM
versions such as the Media Center Edition 2003,2004,2005}
Windows Vista (Retail Customers) - January 2007

As I said the only anomaly was the overly long Vista dev cycle - home
users were upgrading about every 2 years until the XP to Vista gap. So
again Jan 2007 to anytime 2009 would be fine for home users too.

Weren't you supposed to have plonked me?

But thanks. I think your timeline above is more relevant to this group,
though I would quibble over XP SP2, But a decent case could be made for
XP MCE 2005.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[f/fgeorge]

we know that bill gates released vista home pain..even though it was
defective and pure crap..he ripped off a lot of people..just took the
dollarbills and ran...now he wants to trash vista and release another.os..who
is going to step up and buy it..any dumbys in the house.is he so rich and
powerful,that he can just steal from us and laugh all the way to the bank..if
a man steals your car and gets caught,he goes to jail.why is it any
different.with software..look at the pain and suffering..from peoples post on
here.day in and day out.he knew vista was defective.he put it out any
way.rant,complain,bitch,wine and moan.we got a right.we paid for the right.too

And YOU are uniquely qualified to say this because....Just being a
normal everyday person spouting off at the pie hole? Go back to the
poker table or the wife and tell them! We now KNOW you are full of the
proverbial BS and by proving it are diminished in our eyes!