I understand--perhaps they need to broaden the premise in the article--it
was written to cover the situation it describes, but, in fact, as a "fix",
has turned out to have broader "off label" usage. I think the intent is to
get the problem creating the need fixed. There were code fixes in
yesterdays update. I'm waiting for the next update cycle to see if this has
been improved.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.