Virus check of incoming e-mail

B

Brian Gotjunk

Is there a consensus about having virus checking of incoming mail turned ON
or OFF?

If my Antivirus is up to date is checking my e-mail redundant as the program
will (should) catch any viruses anyway?
 
D

David H. Lipman

We'll see what replies you get here... :)

--
Dave




| Is there a consensus about having virus checking of incoming mail turned ON
| or OFF?
|
| If my Antivirus is up to date is checking my e-mail redundant as the program
| will (should) catch any viruses anyway?
| --
| Take out the GARBAGE before replying to my address
|
|
|
 
B

Brian Gotjunk

David H. Lipman said:
We'll see what replies you get here... :)

--
Dave




| Is there a consensus about having virus checking of incoming mail turned ON
| or OFF?
|
| If my Antivirus is up to date is checking my e-mail redundant as the program
| will (should) catch any viruses anyway?
| --
| Take out the GARBAGE before replying to my address
|
|
|

maybe people will be nicer than 'Alias'
 
D

David H. Lipman

I'm used to it. :)

You have to be thick skinned on UseNet.

--
Dave




|
|
| maybe people will be nicer than 'Alias'
|
|
 
N

null

Is there a consensus about having virus checking of incoming mail turned ON
or OFF?

Virus checking email is for lamers :) Just use a sane email app that
won't allow you to Run attackments or auto-run embedded scripts in
HTML. Pegasus and Mozilla email are just two examples of sane email
apps. Forte Agent, which is strictly text and no HTML, is another sane
app.

Delete all unsolicited attackments and be suspicious of attachments
from your lame "friends" as well :) Save them to a download directory.
Let them sit there a few days and then scan them with several good av
scanners that you've just updated. Alternatively, there are file
upload av scanning sites on the internet which can be used if you
don't have some good scanners on your PC which you keep updated.

Even after they're scanned and seem ok, it's a good idea to Open them
in a appropriate viewer. For example, if the file is supposed to be a
picture image file, Open it in Irfan View or some other such app. If
it's alleged to be a PDF then Open it in ACROBAT. Etc. Beware of
screen savers (.SCR files). Don't use them or Run them at all. They
should be banned since they have no purpose nowdays except to sucker
lamers into running malicious code.
If my Antivirus is up to date is checking my e-mail redundant as the program
will (should) catch any viruses anyway?

Never take the word of a antivirus scanner. Never abdicate your
responsiblity for your security. Take security into your own hands.
Learn some "safe hex". Don't be just another lamer. There's too many
of them already making the AV vendors fat while they get infested with
malware and spyware in spite of the use of endless products allegedly
designed to "protect" them.


Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
 
S

Sir_George

Brian,

The choice to have e-mail scanning turned "on" or "off" within an AV program
is strictly a personal preference. Your assumption that it is redundant is
correct, if you are using the same program for both e-mail and on-process
scanning.
 
M

Martin

Brian Gotjunk said:
Is there a consensus about having virus checking of incoming mail turned
ON
or OFF?

If my Antivirus is up to date is checking my e-mail redundant as the
program
will (should) catch any viruses anyway?

Well, some may say it is redundant, and others may come up with a long list
of other things to do instead, but so far the e-mail scanner on Avast has
stopped several virus's attached to e-mails, and that is before I even think
about clicking on the attachment, so to me it makes sense to detect the
virus as early as possible rather than let it sit there waiting to be
detected later.

As soon as the e-mail is retrieved from the server (i.e. before I even read
the message) the e-mail scanner detects a virus and takes action. Surely
that has to be better than waiting until later or manually moving things to
other directories and opening with different applications?
 
N

null

As soon as the e-mail is retrieved from the server (i.e. before I even read
the message) the e-mail scanner detects a virus and takes action. Surely
that has to be better than waiting until later or manually moving things to
other directories and opening with different applications?

What if your one and only av can't detect the malware? New malicious
code and variants appear continually. AV can only detect known
malware, for the most part. Waiting a few days at least gives the
vendor a chance to develop detection capability. And even then your
particular av may not have detection while others do.


Art
http://home.epix.net/~artnpeg
 
M

Martin

What if your one and only av can't detect the malware? New malicious
code and variants appear continually. AV can only detect known
malware, for the most part. Waiting a few days at least gives the
vendor a chance to develop detection capability. And even then your
particular av may not have detection while others do.

Yes, but is that a valid reason *not* to scan incoming e-mails??

Certainly take all relevant steps, I don't trust any attachments unless I
know they're coming, but I still find it handy to have the AV detect and
deal with incoming attacks when it can..... To disable this function (if it
works properly) only seems to make your job that bit harder..
 
H

Heather

Martin said:
Yes, but is that a valid reason *not* to scan incoming e-mails??
Certainly take all relevant steps, I don't trust any attachments unless I
know they're coming, but I still find it handy to have the AV detect and
deal with incoming attacks when it can..... To disable this function (if
it > works properly) only seems to make your job that bit harder..

Yipes....I *almost* agree with Art here. I disabled email scanning and take
proper precautions. All attachment emails go into their own folder,
etc.....and I use safe hex if I decide to check them.

Even more redundant are av's that also scan outgoing mail. If a virus
didn't come IN, why on earth would you check to see if one is going OUT??

Cheers......Heather
 
B

Brian Gotjunk

Heather said:
(if
it > works properly) only seems to make your job that bit harder..

Yipes....I *almost* agree with Art here. I disabled email scanning and take
proper precautions. All attachment emails go into their own folder,
etc.....and I use safe hex if I decide to check them.

Even more redundant are av's that also scan outgoing mail. If a virus
didn't come IN, why on earth would you check to see if one is going OUT??

Cheers......Heather

From all of the posts here is what I have concluded:

Leave inbound e-mail checking turned ON - because it adds another level of
security
Turn OFF outbound e-mail checking - because it is redundant
 
M

Martin

Brian Gotjunk said:
From all of the posts here is what I have concluded:

Leave inbound e-mail checking turned ON - because it adds another level of
security
Turn OFF outbound e-mail checking - because it is redundant

Makes sense to me...
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top