Using MS Registry Ceaner

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Doue
  • Start date Start date
In
Unknown said:
You must be looking in a mirror and talking to yourself.
You described yourself perfectly.

LOL! At a loss for words? That's unlike a pro-troll like
you!
 
Unknown said:
I believe you're correct. That was one of MS goofs. They bought out the
company developing One Care.
It is no longer available and has been replaced by Microsoft Security
Essentials.
Registry cleaners are nothing but disasters.
Don't talk rubbish. Microsoft is actively developing and supporting Online Scanner. The latest version is for Windows 7 and the link is here:

<http://onecare.live.com/site/en-US/center/whatsnew.htm>

Your mummy should spend some time with you and teach you what is going on in this world!
 
You are about as dense as they come. One care is by no means a registry
cleaner. It merely checks for obsolete items
which you yourself can do. IE If you delete a program (such as Norton) the
name may still be in the registry. One Care will find it and give you the
opportunity to delete it. But, that's all.
 
Not at all. Use an open mind (but I doubt you can do that) and read your
posts. Talk about narcissism!
 
Unknown said:
Not at all. Use an open mind (but I doubt you can do that) and read your
posts. Talk about narcissism!



You do realize, don't you, that you're engaged in a battle of wits with
an unarmed man? Hardly seems fair. (But you are feeding his ego.)


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:


http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
 
Yes! Problem is that he is misleading new computer users with his registry
cleaners and now Norton.
 
In
Unknown said:
You are about as dense as they come. One care is by no
means a registry cleaner. It merely checks for obsolete
items

Interesting; where can I verify that information?

HTH,

Twayne`

which you yourself can do. IE If you delete a program (such
as Norton) the name may still be in the registry. One Care
will find it and give you the opportunity to delete it.
But, that's all. "LD55ZRA"

That's what one might call orphaned entries; if they don't
matter to anything, why bother removing them at all? That's
definitely what one would call "cleaning" the registry.

HTH,

Twayne`
 
In
Unknown said:
Not at all. Use an open mind (but I doubt you can do that)
and read your posts. Talk about narcissism!

Yeah, I think you're a narcissist. And a trolling follower to
boot.

Twayne
 
In
Bruce Chambers said:
You do realize, don't you, that you're engaged in a battle
of wits with an unarmed man? Hardly seems fair. (But you
are feeding his ego.)

Ah, one of the major ignorants rears its ugle arse.
 
Since you have multiple registry cleaners, run them and then run One Care
and compare the results.
 
Twayne said:
In

No, for a very long time you've shown your ignorance about
them, including especially any of the more recent releases. My
advice is USE A REPUTABLE, BRANDED REGISTRY CLEANER and you'll
not have any problems. I never have, nor have any of the
considerable number of people I know.

The OneCare cleaner, the one from Microsoft, killed my UlraVNC
install. Now you know someone. HAND
 
Now, now, aren't you being a little harsh? The reason he can't use an
open mind is because it is clearly beyond his capabilities.

Countless cases of problems associated with registry cleaners have been
provided, and he ignores all of them. Only HE knows the Truth.
 
In
Carl Kaufmann said:
The OneCare cleaner, the one from Microsoft, killed my
UlraVNC install. Now you know someone. HAND

No, I don't. I don't know you at all. You're just a bit of
ether and prove nothing. Assuming you're telling the truth and
it did something to UltraVNC, you failed to read the
information about what it was going to do and how to reverse
it should it become necessary.
It's a lot more likely your AV trashed VNC, actually. Many
malware programs see it as a hole to the 'net, which it
technically is.
But I don't know you from Adam.

Twayne`
 
In
Bill in Co. said:
Now, now, aren't you being a little harsh? The reason he
can't use an open mind is because it is clearly beyond his
capabilities.
Countless cases of problems associated with registry
cleaners have been provided, and he ignores all of them.
Only HE knows the Truth.

But many millions more have been provided that show just the
opposite. It means nothing either way: You're the one with the
closed mind and that's been obvious for years now. If you
provide me with sime reputable and verifiable evidence, I
certainly would read it and consider it. But, you can't do
that. And millions of users know you're full of it. You don't
even have any idea of what's currently out there, in fact;
you're holding fast to some puppeteer's infro from
"yesterday". A smart person investigates and finds the answers
for himself; unlike you.

So all I can do is repeat: Cite something useful to support
your cause besides the self-serving prejudices of a few idiots
here.

HTH,

Twayne`
 
Ignoring another one-----------
Twayne said:
In

No, I don't. I don't know you at all. You're just a bit of ether and prove
nothing. Assuming you're telling the truth and it did something to
UltraVNC, you failed to read the information about what it was going to do
and how to reverse it should it become necessary.
It's a lot more likely your AV trashed VNC, actually. Many malware
programs see it as a hole to the 'net, which it technically is.
But I don't know you from Adam.

Twayne`
 
That's obviously because *these* other people didn't know what they were
doing, and then they just assumed a registry cleaner was at fault, which we
ALL know is clearly impossible, lol. Next? :-)
 
On 4/6/2010 6:22 PM On a whim, Bill in Co. pounded out on the keyboard
That's obviously because *these* other people didn't know what they were
doing, and then they just assumed a registry cleaner was at fault, which we
ALL know is clearly impossible, lol. Next? :-)

You are correct in stating "...these other people didn't know what they
were doing...". That sums up why they are blaming something other than
themselves.


Terry R.
 
Quibbling again I see.
Terry R. said:
On 4/6/2010 6:22 PM On a whim, Bill in Co. pounded out on the keyboard


You are correct in stating "...these other people didn't know what they
were doing...". That sums up why they are blaming something other than
themselves.


Terry R.
 
Back
Top