The order of the fields just dictates the TOC line string in contents
- agree if you don't use the subject first, the user must remember the subject and category since neither are passed, but the thread
will still be valid no matter what they chose since it is all done by msg #
--
| Thanks for that, Stefan.
| I have updated the web (at
www.rxs-enterprises.org/tests/discussion/ ) and
| the "help" that goes with it, but found that Subject has to first in the
| list of fields in the TOC, otherwise the auto-fill of the subject field
| when replying to posts does not work.
| --
| Ron
| Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
|
| | > You need to add the Category in the disc1_post.htm form (form properties
| options) under Table of Contents form fields as say:
| > Category Subject From Date
| > (s-toc-fields="Category Subject From Date" in the code view)
| > for them to appear in the TOC
| > --
| >
| > _____________________________________________
| > SBR @ ENJOY (-: [ Microsoft MVP - FrontPage ]
| > "Warning - Using the F1 Key will not break anything!" (-;
| > To find the best Newsgroup for FrontPage support see:
| >
http://www.net-sites.com/sitebuilder/newsgroups.asp
| > _____________________________________________
| >
| >
| | > | I'll leave the pages there for as long as they are used.
| > |
| > | I do not use the discussion web, but the options are normally
| restricted to
| > | those available in the properties dialogues. Your question is worth
| > | investigating further, however.
| > | --
| > | Ron
| > | Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
| > |
| > | | > | > Dear RonX
| > | > Thank you very much for the 'test'. I have tried a few options on it
| and
| > | will continue, if you are able to leave it there for a short while.
| Main
| > | things at this stage are - if "Category" can't display in the TOC it's
| > | value is diminished and therefore, is it possible to change or edit the
| > | fields which currently do display in the TOC?
| > | >
| > | > Thanks again, much appreciated
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > David C
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > "Ronx" wrote:
| > | >
| > | > > In addition to the KB article posted by Jens, you may wish to look
| at
| > | > >
www.rxs-enterprises.org/tests/discussion/
| > | > > --
| > | > > Ron
| > | > > Reply only to group - emails will be deleted unread.
| > | > >
| > | > > | > | > > > After creating a basic site with the template wizard, I realised
| that
| > | I
| > | > > could not follow / understand the flow (tree structure) from a
| > | "Comment" up
| > | > > to the "Discussion Title". I spent hours in vain trying to find a
| > | > > description or article - ie something like "About the Discussion
| Web
| > | Site
| > | > > Template". I spent 3-4 hours on the phone with MS NSW Australia,
| who
| > | were
| > | > > also apparently not able to find anything or anyone who knew the
| > | answers!!
| > | > > > I find it difficult to understand why MS would create a web
| template,
| > | > > then not provide any description or article about it. Does anyone
| know
| > | of
| > | > > an article or description please? Or, if not, would someone
| explain
| > | the
| > | > > bits to me please. Things like - what is "Category"; why does it
| > | display
| > | > > as a combo; where and how does it fit into the heirarchical tree
| > | ...etc?
| > | > > If necessary i am willing to pay a modest fee. Thank you in
| > | anticipation.
| > | > > > --
| > | > > > David C
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
