S
Stephan Rose
Big deal so you have a Linux distro that does not want to help the market by
enabling it to interoperate with the platform on over 90% of the worlds PCs
and a huge proportion of the worlds servers; unlike Novell, Xandros and
Linspire who all signed patent agreements
So they can sit there not wanting to open discussions with Microsoft and can
just wait for the inevitable patent infringement suite.
Frankly a pretty poor and petty display from a Linux distro (and more
accurately its parent sponsor) who appear to be unwilling to actually help
the consumer by working together to make the IT world a better and more
interoperable place for all.
The whole patent thing is utter bullshit.
I remember reading somewhere about MS submitting over 3,000 patents a YEAR?
A year has 365 days the last time I checked.
So that makes roughly just over 8 patents a day. Now considering a 40 hour
workweek and 5 days, that means 56 patents in 5 days or 1.4 patents per
hour.
So let me get this right.
It takes MS 5 years to produce *one* operating systems but yet they can
generate a patentable idea every single hour of a 40 hour workweek?
And out of this huge mass of patents they have, they can only barely
scrounge up 235 that they refuse to even name?
I mean come on...If someone doesn't smell bullshit here they need to have
their nose examined.
Out of curiosity, I did some googling and found one random patent of
Microsoft's that just made me gag.
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/34234.html
"The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granted Patent No. 6,727,830 to
Microsoft in late April. It spells out a "method and system" for enabling
a user to call up different versions of an application depending on how
buttons on a "limited resource computing device" are manipulated.
For instance, a single click might call up the default version of an
application, pushing and holding the button could cause an alternative
version to be activated, and still different functions could be activated
by a "double-click.""
Any developer who's ever done any User interface work is in a state of
disbelief right now after reading that. This essentially means that
virtually every single program I've written violates that patent!
Patenting that a single click could do something different than a double
click? I mean COME ON!!!
What else do they have patents on? Rectangles? Circles? Variable names?
Rectangular VS a Round button? A^2 + B^2 = C^2? Planetary alignment? Maybe
they will patent the solar eclipse next and charge everyone that watches
it. I am sure the patent office would grant it!
I think I should try to take a shit in my toilet, take a picture of it,
and submit that to the patent office as a special way of taking a dump. If
shit falls in that particular way, it flushes more efficiently.
The entire software patent issue is in a state of bullshit. The patent
office has been handing it out like water because they don't understand
*what* they are handing out a patent on. As long as it's worded
technically enough to where the patent monkey can't understand it, it gets
approved.
If it smells, tastes, looks and feels like bullshit...it probably is.
Wouldn't be the first time that MS got into a bullshit lawsuit and got
their ass handed to them in court now wouldn't it?
And I really would like to know how they will enforce their so called
patents outside of the US against software that is developed world-wide
in areas where their patents have no validity.
--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6
å›ã®ã“ã¨æ€ã„å‡ºã™æ—¥ãªã‚“ã¦ãªã„ã®ã¯
å›ã®ã“ã¨å¿˜ã‚ŒãŸã¨ããŒãªã„ã‹ã‚‰
