Anna said:
I know you mentioned that in one of your previous postings as a result of
your coming across a review of the ASUS P5B motherboard in which the
reviewer commented that an auxiliary driver was necessary to install
before the system would recognize an installed optical drive. To the best
of my knowledge that is simply not so. AFAIK, there is no problem with
that Intel chipset along the lines mentioned by the reviewer. When that
motherboard is installed it will detect a optical drive with a PATA
interface without the need of some auxiliary driver/controller just like
every other motherboard being manufactured today. If it didn't, how in the
world would one be able to install an operating system from the OS
installation CD, let alone the drivers contained on the motherboard's
installation CD?
I think there are 2 issues here. Recognition by the BIOS and recognition by
Windows. The reviewer mentioned nothing about recognition at boot time. As
you note, perhaps that works well without a special driver.
However, he was clear that the optical drive is not recognized by Windows
until the JMicron driver is installed, which can't be done from the
unrecognized drive.
If XP doesn't have a built in JMicron driver, which is not surprising
considering how old SP1 is, that all makes perfect sense. The lack of Intel
P965 chipset PATA support clinches it.
If you have *definitive* evidence to the contrary, I would certainly like
to hear about it.
Since I only have the one source from a professional motherboard reviewer, I
have to assume the source is definitive until someone comes up with *more*
definitive answer. I can't dismiss what is obviously a knowledgeable review
without at least as substantial evidence to the contrary. I appreciate you
taking the time to reply, but to me you haven't presented anything which
would quality as more definitive.
Bruce.