Thermal Cement - where to buy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Smith
  • Start date Start date
M

Mike Smith

Howdy folks

One of the fans on my vertically mounted motherboard has come unstuck,
and is plonked on the reverse of the graphics board. Fortunately no
major damage, but I need to glue/cement it back in place.

I've looked around online and found plenty of thermal paste, but I
need something to hold it in place, as well as conduct. Any
recommended sources/products? (Ideally UK)

The fan (someone who knows more than me) is evidetly there to help
cool the onboard motherboard chips ie its not a processor fan, and its
not just there for general cooling.

Any help appreciated?
 
Mike Smith said:
Howdy folks

One of the fans on my vertically mounted motherboard has come unstuck,
and is plonked on the reverse of the graphics board. Fortunately no
major damage, but I need to glue/cement it back in place.

I've looked around online and found plenty of thermal paste, but I
need something to hold it in place, as well as conduct. Any
recommended sources/products? (Ideally UK)

The fan (someone who knows more than me) is evidetly there to help
cool the onboard motherboard chips ie its not a processor fan, and its
not just there for general cooling.

Any help appreciated?

I'd use a dab of epoxy. Some mobos use a double sided adhesive film. SVC.com
and others were/are selling an Arctic Silver branded epoxy specifically for
attaching heat sinks.
 
Mike Smith said:
Howdy folks

One of the fans on my vertically mounted motherboard has come unstuck,
and is plonked on the reverse of the graphics board. Fortunately no
major damage, but I need to glue/cement it back in place.

I've looked around online and found plenty of thermal paste, but I
need something to hold it in place, as well as conduct. Any
recommended sources/products? (Ideally UK)

http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_silver_thermal_adhesive.htm

-- Bob Day
http://bobday.vze.com
 
Mike said:
One of the fans on my vertically mounted motherboard
has come unstuck, and is plonked on the reverse of
the graphics board. Fortunately no major damage, but
I need to glue/cement it back in place.
The fan (someone who knows more than me) is evidetly
there to help cool the onboard motherboard chips ie
its not a processor fan

It would be highly unusual for just the fan to come off because every
such fan I've seen was attached very securely to its heatsink with
clips or screws. But if you mean a heatsink came off, then you can
simply use regular epoxy or silicone rubber glue (RTV) since the chip
you're referring to isn't one of the hotter ones. Just clean off any
existing glue or tape very thoroughly from the mating surfaces, and
press and swirl the heatsink to squeeze out excess glue. Let the glue
cure sufficiently before putting the device back into use; that would
be 30-60 minutes for RTV or regular epoxy, 1-5 minutes for fast cure
epoxy (must be mixed much more carefully or may never cure). I prefer
RTV since it can be sliced through if you ever decide to remove the
heatsink later.

Ignore any bad advice about applying thermal paste to the middle of the
chip and using a drop of super glue or epoxy in each corner of the chip
package. Also ignore hysterical types who insist you need to use a
special thermal glue since that's true only for CPUs and some video
chips.
 
It would be highly unusual for just the fan to come off because every
such fan I've seen was attached very securely to its heatsink with
clips or screws. But if you mean a heatsink came off, then you can
simply use regular epoxy or silicone rubber glue (RTV) since the chip
you're referring to isn't one of the hotter ones. Just clean off any
existing glue or tape very thoroughly from the mating surfaces, and
press and swirl the heatsink to squeeze out excess glue. Let the glue
cure sufficiently before putting the device back into use; that would
be 30-60 minutes for RTV or regular epoxy, 1-5 minutes for fast cure
epoxy (must be mixed much more carefully or may never cure). I prefer
RTV since it can be sliced through if you ever decide to remove the
heatsink later.

Ignore any bad advice about applying thermal paste to the middle of the
chip and using a drop of super glue or epoxy in each corner of the chip
package. Also ignore hysterical types who insist you need to use a
special thermal glue since that's true only for CPUs and some video
chips.


Thanks for this

Just to clarify - this pic shows the fan dangling
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1432.jpg


and this shows where it had fallen from (the green square above the
graphics card)
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1433.jpg


So there were never any screws, but just the two 'hooks' thingies
 
Thanks for this

Just to clarify - this pic shows the fan dangling
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1432.jpg


and this shows where it had fallen from (the green square above the
graphics card)
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1433.jpg


So there were never any screws, but just the two 'hooks' thingies

Use the wire clip that's still on the fan and clip the ends onto two
opposing wire loops on the motherboard. If one of the loops detached
from the motherboard, just re-solder it back in before reinstalling
the fan.

Stephen


--
 
Mike said:
Howdy folks

One of the fans on my vertically mounted motherboard has come unstuck,
and is plonked on the reverse of the graphics board. Fortunately no
major damage, but I need to glue/cement it back in place.

I would think that using ordinary epoxy or silicone rubber would be
worse than simply leaving the chip bare with no fan. O' course, I don't
know everything.
 
Ignore any bad advice about applying thermal paste to the middle of the
chip and using a drop of super glue or epoxy in each corner of the chip
package.

Hmmm ... that doesn't sound like such a bad idea. Why is it bad?
 
Matt said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote:
Hmmm ... that doesn't sound like such a bad idea. Why is it bad?

You don't mix oil and glue, except acrylic glue. Check any
manufacturer's directions.

On the other hand chip temperatures are unlikely to be a problem even
for regular super glue. Still I'd rather use silicone rubber or epoxy
glue.
 
Matt said:
I would think that using ordinary epoxy or silicone rubber
would be worse than simply leaving the chip bare with no
fan. O' course, I don't know everything.

Why do you think that, and what tests have you run or seen? Epoxy or
RTV would have to be very, very thick to make the chip run hotter than
with no fan or heatsink, and any realistic thickness of of either
material between the chip package and heatsink will improve the
cooling, simply because any solid or liquid conducts heat far, far
better than air does.
 
Mike said:
Just to clarify - this pic shows the fan dangling
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1432.jpg

and this shows where it had fallen from (the green square above the
graphics card)
http://www.bestsf.net/images/100_1433.jpg
So there were never any screws, but just the two 'hooks' thingies

I suggest you epoxy the heatsink back to the fan and also get new
mechanical attachments. Electronics parts dealers and sometimes even
hardware stores (True Value, etc., not Lowe's or Home Depot) have such
nylon clips, or you should be able to use nylon nuts and bolts.
 
Matt wrote:




Why do you think that, and what tests have you run or seen? Epoxy or
RTV would have to be very, very thick to make the chip run hotter than
with no fan or heatsink, and any realistic thickness of of either
material between the chip package and heatsink will improve the
cooling, simply because any solid or liquid conducts heat far, far
better than air does.

Not saying you're wrong ... but the air is moving, so that the air in
contact with the surface of the chip is never heated above the ambient
case temperature. On the other hand, I haven't seen a northbridge
without a heatsink ...
 
Matt said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote:
I would think that using ordinary epoxy or silicone rubber
would be worse than simply leaving the chip bare with no
fan. O' course, I don't know everything.


Not saying you're wrong ... but the air is moving, so that the air in
contact with the surface of the chip is never heated above the ambient
case temperature.

Then how do you explain the air inside the case being hotter than room
air since it also moves? By your line of reasoning, a chip package
exposed directly to ambient air should stay cooler than one in good
contact with a heatsink.

Again, I ask: What tests have you run or seen?
 
Matt said:
Not saying you're wrong ... but the air is moving, so that the air in
contact with the surface of the chip is never heated above the ambient
case temperature.

Heat flows from hot to cold so if the ambient is 'warmer' than the chip
it's going to be heating the IC. Clearly, this is not the reason one runs
air over it.

In fact, the chip will always be warmer than the ambient case air since it
must be warmer to cause heat to flow (from hot to cold) and when the heat
flows it warms the immediate air which will then be warmer than the case
ambient from whence it came before being heated by the warmer IC.
 
Then how do you explain the air inside the case being hotter than room
air since it also moves? By your line of reasoning, a chip package
exposed directly to ambient air should stay cooler than one in good
contact with a heatsink.

I was a little careless in my statement. Yes, the air right at the
surface is hotter than the average case air temperature. My point
should have been that the bare package is cooled by convection, so that
there is a flow of the cooling material (air). My intuition was that
such convection would be more effective than conduction through a
glass-like or rubber-like solid.
Again, I ask: What tests have you run or seen?

Please consider my post to be a request for pointers to such tests.
 
Matt said:
(e-mail address removed) wrote:
I was a little careless in my statement. Yes, the air
right at the surface is hotter than the average case air
temperature. My point should have been that the bare
package is cooled by convection, so that there is a flow
of the cooling material (air). My intuition was that
such convection would be more effective than conduction
through a glass-like or rubber-like solid.

Again, that's correct for thick layers of those solids but not for the
thin layers used between chip packages and heatsinks.

Just measuring chip or chip package temperature against ambient air
temperature is a good way to test a heatsink or the material used
between them.
 
Back
Top