Leythos said:I believe it has benefit, and you don't. I guess we're never going to
get past this, so I agree to disagree.
Leythos said:I believe it has benefit, and you don't. I guess we're never going to
get past this, so I agree to disagree.
You don't believe that courts around the world have ruled that MS is a
predatory monopoly?!
You don't believe that courts have ruled that MS is a patent infringer?!
But you still believe Iraq had massive piles of WMDs in pre-war 2003,
despite Bush own WMD inspectors coming to the conclusion that there
weren't!
Do you still believe the Earth is flat?!
PMSL! Every opinion is biased in one way or another. You are just
lying to yourself by saying you don't have a bias.
LOL! You are a fool.
No, you're wrong, full stop. Please, explain to everyone how WGA/N
improves a computer user's experience or provides more security. What
benefit? At best, it wastes time. At worst, it puts the end user through
WGA/N hell.
Leythos said:I believe that MS has some very rough vendor restrictions, and have
seen worse in many companies, but, I agree that they are very rough.
I do not believe that MS is a monopoly at all, there are viable
alternatives.
Yes, I believe it, as well as with many other companies that do the
same. I suppose you think the Red-Cross and United Way are good
organizations without fault?
Yes, as there has been published proof that they did have them.
Nope, unlike you I can open my eyes and see for myself.
Nope, I based my opinions on the facts I have available to me and the
validity of the data used to create the facts.
Thanks, from you that makes me feel good, as I generally thing
everything you say is the actual opposite of how it really is.
Not for most average computer users. Its hard for normal consumers to
even find a find with another venders OS installed on a PC.
Have the Red Cross and United Way infringed on others rights, like MS?
Published in totally delusional press, like the Moonie Times,
WorldNutDaily, NewsMucks, and by Rupert Murdock owned Media!
Hell, the National Enquirer has better journalistic standards than those
sources!
LOL! But you just choose to keep your eyes shut.
What facts? You don't present any real verifiable facts. You are lying
to yourself again.
To quote one of your Heros, "Ditto."
Leythos said:I'm not a Rush fan, but he's one of the people I listen too from time
to time, as well as many left leaning types, so that I can see what
each side has to say.
Unlike you I look at all sides and don't close
my eyes/ears when I see/hear something that disagrees with what I
already think I know.
WGA/N has no benefit to the end user. You can't name one real benefit.
Leythos said:Already did in this group with Alias, you just ignored it.
Leythos said:Already did in this group with Alias, you just ignored it.
LOL! Telling people that they are a sucker, and then getting them to
pay for the crimes of others! That's a benefit to the End User?!
What about the hundreds of millions of users that have totally legit
installs, WGA/N has no benefit all!
Leythos said:That's your opinion, not how others may see it working.
I'm glad to know that the licenses we have are legit, not glad that WGAN
wanted to keep checking, so I uninstalled it, but I'm glad to know, as
are our customers, that everyone of their licenses/installs is valid.
That's a benefit, even if you don't consider it so.
[email protected] said:That is cold solace since an honest person or organization
would have nothing else than legitimate licenses. And it is
relief to you, knowing that your clients have confirmed your
honesty. But what if one of these legitimate sales turned up
a false negative? Willing to pay this price?
Leythos said:Already did, in another reply, you just don't agree.
Dodge.
I do agree that WGAN is useless after the first time it runs, and I've
even sent a complaint to MS asking that it, after it validates a good
install, should uninstall itself and never run again.
It's useless, full stop.
Leythos said:That's your opinion, not how others may see it working.
I'm glad to know that the licenses we have are legit, not glad that
WGAN wanted to keep checking, so I uninstalled it, but I'm glad to
know, as are our customers, that everyone of their licenses/installs
is valid. That's a benefit, even if you don't consider it so.
Leythos said:Yes, I am. If one of them was pirated, as in my own company, I would go
after the vendor that sold the pirated copy to me.
Unlike many people that make uninformed/unintelligent purchases, I
research who/where I purchase from before making the purchase, and not
just with software. I've never made a fly-by-night purchase in my life,
never felt that saving $5 was worth the risk.
I knew the legitacy of my copy of software long before WGA/N!
You needed some piece of useless technology to tell you. PMSL!
<<snipped>>
You didn't read the commentary. You, the vendor, has just
been called a counterfeiter and pirate by one of your paying
customers just because WGA told him that the copy of Windows
you sold him is not genuine.
How much is it going to cost you
to recover your good name and hiring an attorney to counter-sue
someone who is totally pissed off at you and has a bona fide
WGA report in hand.
It really doesn't matter, does it now,
how much research you did or bought for resale from impeccable
wholesalers. And, the more WGA checks, even the same sample,
there will always be the statistical probability of turning
up an erroneous report. Come down off your cross and think
about the feelings of the equally honest and sincere people
on the other side.