Symantec 10.2

[ATC]

Are there any known issues when installing Symantec 10.2 Corporate edition?

 

[Conor]

Are there any known issues when installing Symantec 10.2 Corporate edition?

Yes. Brings your system to its knees as all Symantec and McAfee rubbish
does.

 

[Bob]

No issues it works fine.

 

[Synapse Syndrome]

Are there any known issues when installing Symantec 10.2 Corporate
edition?

Depends on which one you are talking about. You need the special Vista
edition, and it works very well.

ss.

 

[Synapse Syndrome]

Are there any known issues when installing Symantec 10.2 Corporate
edition?

http://www.symantec.com/vista/sav-vista.html

 

[Bob]

I'm running it on several Vista machines and there are no problems.
Your post is just rubbish.

 

[Synapse Syndrome]

Yes. Brings your system to its knees as all Symantec and McAfee rubbish
does.

No, the Symantec Antivirus Corporate is completely different and has always
performed extremely well. I think the latest Norton home version is
actually based on the corporate version now, so you will find that it is
much improved.

ss.

 

[ATC]

Thx. I'll be installing on the "home Prem" version.

 

[ATC]

Thx Bob

No issues it works fine.

 

[Michael Cecil]

Yes. Brings your system to its knees as all Symantec and McAfee rubbish
does.

Symantec Antivirus is not at all the same as Norton AV. SAV 10.2 is fully
Vista compatible. Works fine here.

 

[Reggie Dunbar]

I am running 10.2 on two computers -- one Vista 32 and other Vista 64 and
they both work fine.

The UAC mouse clicks slow down Vista more than A/V!

 

[Conor]

I'm running it on several Vista machines and there are no problems.
Your post is just rubbish.

It isn't. It's born out of several years of having to sort out machines
it brings to their knees.

Ask any IT professional who has been doing the job for more than a
couple of years and they'll all tell you the same. It's bloated shite.

 

[Conor]

No, the Symantec Antivirus Corporate is completely different and has always
performed extremely well. I think the latest Norton home version is
actually based on the corporate version now, so you will find that it is
much improved.

I have had experience of the latest home version and it isn't.

 

[Leythos]

It isn't. It's born out of several years of having to sort out machines
it brings to their knees.

Ask any IT professional who has been doing the job for more than a
couple of years and they'll all tell you the same. It's bloated shite.

Symantec Corporate Edition 10.x (actually 7+) is nothing like the Norton
or Symantec personal/residential editions - almost like they were made by
two different companies. Norton got it wrong, Symantec got it right.

I bought 10 licenses for Norton 2006 last year, returned it because it
made the machines slow as heck and caused other problems, bought Symantec
Corp 10.0 for less, and it installed without any issues, was almost not
there, didn't find a single resource problem - except the added feature of
doing an on-startup scan, which I delete on ever PC.

 

[Synapse Syndrome]

I have had experience of the latest home version and it isn't.

Well, I could be wrong about it now being based on corporate, as I can't
remember why I thought that.

ss.