F
Frank
ray said:Since shortly after vista's release most competent consultants have
advised waiting for at least SP1.
Liar!
Frank
ray said:Since shortly after vista's release most competent consultants have
advised waiting for at least SP1.
Frank said:lol...Only in your nightmarish dreams...but never in reality!
Loser!
Frank
The features I can live without are:
-Special vista slowness, your computer now simulates a 386
-Instability, blue screens, reboots, freezes
-A incredibly stupid GUI made from monkeys for monkeys
-Incompatibility with a multitude of hardware and software...
-Constant danger of all the viruses and malware that windows
always had, since vista is not more secure than XP
Alias said:Considering you can't...
Frank said:Liar!
Frank
Tiberius said:I know more about vista because I know more about computers
you banana treeswinging subhuman
back into your jar now.. ill sprinkle some shredded banana flakes in your
liquid if you promise to be a good monkey brain
or if you dont behave yourself Ill connect you to a linux computer...
we all know you hate that.. hehe
Frank said:That's only a personal opinion. Reality is, you're lost in Vista and
can't find your way.
It's also obvious the OP is a troll, proly a linux loser from trash dot.
Notice, they never returned which is a sure sign of a troll.
Frank
And, I assume, you define "most competent" as those who agree with
that position.
You see statements like this, all the time, and with every new version
of Windows that comes out. My view is that it's a nonsensical
statement.
Hotfixes to Vista (and every other version of Windows) come out all
the time, as needed. At some point Microsoft decides to roll up all
the existing hotfixes into something called a service pack (they may
or may not add other hotfixes at that time). But there's nothing magic
about the day when they decide to do it, and it's entirely at their
discretion as to when to do so. Because it's an arbitrary decision as
to when to release it, it doesn't really represent any significant
milestone in the life of the product.
If you don't want to install a new version of Windows immediately,
that's certainly your prerogative. But it makes just as much sense to
say "wait six months" or "wait 197.8 days" as it does to say "wait for
SP1."
Personally, my experience with Vista is that it's been very stable,
and by and large I like it a lot. I'm not sure that everyone needs to
rush out to upgrade to it, but for anyone buying a new computer and
wondering what operating system to put on it, I certainly recommend
Vista.
Frank said:Wrong! I didn't, which is entirely different from ..."can't".
I don't answer to you or anyone in this ng.
If you don't like...what do you say..."tough titties"?
lol
Frank
Frank said:Notice, they never returned which is a sure sign of a troll.
Frank
Frank said:Liar!
Frank
Frank said:lol...Only in your nightmarish dreams...but never in reality!
Loser!
Frank
* Ken Blake, MVP:
WinXP SP2 was more than just roll ups, it was a "significant milestone".
Tiberius said:I know vista better than you
Crawl back into your jar, monkeybrain!
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.