Switching from x64 back to x86 with an upgrade pk

  • Thread starter Colin Barnhorst
  • Start date
C

Colin Barnhorst

This is the last batch of upgrade experiments (for now). This one is all
about reverting from 64bits to 32 bits using a Vista Home Premium x86
upgrade edition product key. There are some mystifying results this time.

I installed XP Pro x64 on a single drive system with 512MB. I then
installed Office 2003 pro. Finally I launched Vista Setup x86 from the XP
Pro x64 desktop and performed a custom installation using a VHP UE pk.

To follow this it helps to know a little about the folder structure of x64
Windows. Native x64 software is installed in the "Program Files" folder and
x86 software, like Office, is installed in the "Program Files (x86)" folder.
This is the reverse of what some new users of 64bit Windows expect, but we
x64 users get used to it. The point is that a 32bit version of Windows
should not have a Program Files (x86) folder, just a Program Files folder.
The custom installed VHP x86 has both folders!

I don't know whether this stuff is supposed to be rolled up into windows.old
and just wasn't or if it is expected behavior. It is consistent, though,
because I reproduced it to make sure. Whatever, this is NOT the equivalent
of a clean install. The executibles are nowhere to be found, windows.old or
otherwise, but the folders contain dll's and other small system files. Some
stuff is in the windows.old folder and some stuff is not.

Does this copy of VHP run OK? Seems to. Do I trust it? Uh, uh. Not until
I hear a reasonable explanation of why I should want my computer this way.

I suggest users not try an x86 to x64 custom installation. I suggest
reverting to a clean install of W2k or XP x86 and before upgrading with
Vista x86.

(I tried a couple of times to include an attachment, but the messages are
not showing up on the server.)
 
M

Michael Jennings

They've always fixed the servers when they've gone fssst, bchrl, ptchush
in the past. Not immediately, but generally it does get done eventually.
 
R

Rock

Very odd. Thanks again Colin.

Colin Barnhorst said:
This is the last batch of upgrade experiments (for now). This one is all
about reverting from 64bits to 32 bits using a Vista Home Premium x86
upgrade edition product key. There are some mystifying results this time.

I installed XP Pro x64 on a single drive system with 512MB. I then
installed Office 2003 pro. Finally I launched Vista Setup x86 from the XP
Pro x64 desktop and performed a custom installation using a VHP UE pk.

To follow this it helps to know a little about the folder structure of x64
Windows. Native x64 software is installed in the "Program Files" folder
and
x86 software, like Office, is installed in the "Program Files (x86)"
folder.
This is the reverse of what some new users of 64bit Windows expect, but we
x64 users get used to it. The point is that a 32bit version of Windows
should not have a Program Files (x86) folder, just a Program Files folder.
The custom installed VHP x86 has both folders!

I don't know whether this stuff is supposed to be rolled up into
windows.old and just wasn't or if it is expected behavior. It is
consistent, though, because I reproduced it to make sure. Whatever, this
is NOT the equivalent of a clean install. The executibles are nowhere to
be found, windows.old or otherwise, but the folders contain dll's and
other small system files. Some stuff is in the windows.old folder and
some stuff is not.

Does this copy of VHP run OK? Seems to. Do I trust it? Uh, uh. Not
until I hear a reasonable explanation of why I should want my computer
this way.

I suggest users not try an x86 to x64 custom installation. I suggest
reverting to a clean install of W2k or XP x86 and before upgrading with
Vista x86.

(I tried a couple of times to include an attachment, but the messages are
not showing up on the server.)
 
J

Jane C

Colin, do you mean "I suggest users not try an x64 to x86 custom
installation." instead of "I suggest users not try an x86 to x64 custom
installation." ?
 
C

Colin Barnhorst

Yeah. Tell 'em to hold off for more info on x64 to x86 custom installs, or
at least have a backup plan. What I think I'd tell them to do if they
haven't installed at all is do an unactivated install of x86 and image it.
Then use a custom install to switch to x64 and not activate until they
decide whether or not they like x64. If they don't like x64 then restore
the x86 image and activate rather than do a custom install of x86 over x64.
I don't know the impacts of the strange setup I keep getting with these
scenarios. Hopefully someone will figure out that there is no big deal.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top