Stripping Page File across Multiple Hard drives

G

Gerry

In earlier NT systems it was usual to have such a file on each hard
drive partition, if there were more than one partition, with the idea of
having the file as near as possible to the 'action' on the disk. In XP
the optimisation implied by this has been found not to justify the
overhead, and normally there is only a single page file in the first
instance.

Source: http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm


--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
P

philo

Gerry said:
In earlier NT systems it was usual to have such a file on each hard
drive partition, if there were more than one partition, with the idea of
having the file as near as possible to the 'action' on the disk. In XP
the optimisation implied by this has been found not to justify the
overhead, and normally there is only a single page file in the first
instance.

Source: http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm


If you have enough RAM...
then I doubt if the page file size or placement comes into play anyway
 
A

Al Dykes

If you have enough RAM...
then I doubt if the page file size or placement comes into play anyway



Size and placement isn't the issue, it's reads and writes per second.

This is roughly related to "Page Faults" and "PF Delta" in
taskmanager, which can be selected in View/Select Columns
 
B

Boris

philo said:
If you have enough RAM...
then I doubt if the page file size or placement comes into play anyway
One of my systems: an older XP system with P4 3GHZ and 1.5GB of RAM -
started running pretty slowly. The total memory usage almost never got over
0.5GB...so I just completely disabled the pagefile. After that the system
became much snappier.

Boris
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top