Spyware vs Spyware Doctor

[Greg Pickett]

The following details the spyware risks that were
identified by the above program.
This scan was conducted after a full scan of Microsoft
Antispyware (BETA).

Could you please advise why the Spyware Doctor picked up
these issues whilst the Microsoft program did not.

The Spyware program is only the base level and has not yet
been registered to have the full version scan the system.

Initial information from PC Tools is that there may be
other risks which will be picked up with the full version
post registration. Great way to have people pay for the
program.

Scan Results:scan start: 21-Feb-2005 8:44:52 AM
scan stop: 21-Feb-2005 8:57:39 AM
scanned items: 145258
found items: 3
found and ignored: 0
tools used: General Scanner, Process Scanner, Hosts
scanner, LSP Scanner, Registry Scanner, Cookie Scanner,
Browser Defaults, Favorites and ZoneMap Scanner, Browser
Scanner, Disk Scanner



Infection Name Location Risk
CWS Unknown Variant
HKCU\software\microsoft\windows\currentversion\run#
#start wingman profiler Medium
FUNWEBPRODUCTS HKLM\SOFTWARE\FunWebProducts
Medium
Tracking Cookie(s) greg pickett@bfast[2].txt
Medium
Cheers
Greg

 

[Bill Sanderson]

It's kind of hard to tell from this list. The last one is a cookie--these
builds of Microsoft antispyware don't look at cookies.

FunWebProducts and CWS are both definite baddies, but is what was found
something indicative of actual live infection, or just a remnant that was
missed? The CWS reference involves a syntax I haven't seen--and I wonder
whether it is a false positive?

Googling for this one, it looks like a legit piece of Logitech software.

http://startup.iamnotageek.com/srch-Start Wingman Profiler.html
(do a text search for wingman)