Slow page conflict

D

David Isaacs

In my not finished web page I notice a conflict when looking at
problems--slow pages, and looking at the opening time at bottom of the page.
One example is a page that shows 57sec in slow pages, and 29sec at the
bottom of the page. Both @56kbps. Which is the more accurate?
Dave Isaacs.
 
S

Stefan B Rusynko

Neither is accurate, but the slow page report is better than the design view time (often does not include times for all content like
includes or shared borders)

--




| In my not finished web page I notice a conflict when looking at
| problems--slow pages, and looking at the opening time at bottom of the page.
| One example is a page that shows 57sec in slow pages, and 29sec at the
| bottom of the page. Both @56kbps. Which is the more accurate?
| Dave Isaacs.
|
|
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

FrontPage2003 Slow Page 1
load time 12
Pages are slow to load. 2
Conflicts with Front page 2003 sp3 (Windows XP) 3
Site summary 12
slow pages 2
conflict in d/l times 2
slow pages 4

Top