Slow page conflict

  • Thread starter Thread starter David Isaacs
  • Start date Start date
D

David Isaacs

In my not finished web page I notice a conflict when looking at
problems--slow pages, and looking at the opening time at bottom of the page.
One example is a page that shows 57sec in slow pages, and 29sec at the
bottom of the page. Both @56kbps. Which is the more accurate?
Dave Isaacs.
 
Neither is accurate, but the slow page report is better than the design view time (often does not include times for all content like
includes or shared borders)

--




| In my not finished web page I notice a conflict when looking at
| problems--slow pages, and looking at the opening time at bottom of the page.
| One example is a page that shows 57sec in slow pages, and 29sec at the
| bottom of the page. Both @56kbps. Which is the more accurate?
| Dave Isaacs.
|
|
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

FrontPage2003 Slow Page 1
load time 12
Pages are slow to load. 2
Conflicts with Front page 2003 sp3 (Windows XP) 3
conflict in d/l times 2
Hyperlinks not displaying 4
slow pages 2
Site summary 12

Back
Top