short history of Sega Dreamcast's birth

A

Air Raid

'A do-or-die machine which will decide whether Sega stays in the
hardware biz'

Dreamcast is a system born out of Sega's darkest hour, a do-or-die
machine which will decide whether the company stays in the hardware
business. Its precursor, the 32bit Sega Saturn, had been widely
expected to conquer the world with Nintendo's own second next
generation system heavily delayed -- due to the collapse of an
alliance with Sony -- and neither Atari nor 3DO seriously threatening
mass market success.
All that changed with the November '93 announcement of the Sony
PlayStation, a system which would heavily defeat Sega's system and
become a considerable influence on how Sega designed Dreamcast.
Although there had been rumours of Sony producing a console, what came
as a heavy shock to Sega was the technical superiority of the
PlayStation. While the Saturn had been designed as perhaps the
ultimate 2D arcade machine, albeit with a substantial 3D capability,
PlayStation was totally committed to polygons.

Sega boss Hayao Nakayama angrily berated Sega's engineers for their
failings, but it was too late to totally redesign the system if the
1994 launch was too proceed. Instead, Sega added yet another processor
to an already over-complicated design. In terms of raw power, the new
Saturn was much more of a match for PlayStation, but it would never be
an easy machine to program for. The twin CPU design in particular
demanded highly specialised machine code rather than the C most
Japanese developers prefered: barely a year after Saturn's launch a
key Sega manager admitted only one in a hundred programmers would have
the skill to use the machine's full potential.

Ironically, the Saturn's Japanese launch would be Sega's best ever
performance in its home territory. Even a flawed version of Virtua
Fighting was enough to transform the company's traditional weakness in
its home territory. Overseas, however, it was to be a different
matter. Scepticism about the prospects of a CD-ROM machine succeeding
in the cost-sensitive US market meant Saturn was originally partnered
with a low-cost, cart-based system codenamed Jupiter -- principally
due to American scepticism that a CD-ROM machine could be
competitively priced. When Saturn was upgraded, Jupiter got axed in
favour of Mars, an upgrade for Sega's 16bit Mega Drive which was
supposed to protect the company's hugely lucrative US market. In fact,
32X was an unmitigated disaster, drawing vital developer support away
from Saturn and destroying the company's reputation among gamers who
found themselves with an add-on with barely a handful of games.

The Saturn debacle would cost the jobs of Sega's American and Japanese
bosses, beside reducing its US empire to a ruin running up losses of
$167 million in 1997. For any replacement machine the lessons were
clear: a single format, complete user-friendliness for developers and
a new brand -- so low had sunk the once mighty Sega name.

As soon as any console is launched, work is usually underway on a
replacement but the Saturn's troubles gave this process an unusual
urgency for Sega. By 1995, rumours surfaced that US defence
contractors Lockheed Martin Corp. were already deep into the
development of a replacement, possibly even with a view to releasing
it as a Saturn upgrade. There were even claims that during Saturn's
pre-launch panic a group of managers argued the machine should simply
be scrapped in favour of an all-new LMC design.

Sega originally entered into partnership with LMC to solve problems
with its Model 2 coin-op board, however by 1995 the relationship had
soured somewhat with the Model 3 board suffering massive delays.
Around the same time, 3DO began shopping around its 64bit M2 system.
According to informed sources, Sega's Japanese bankers had brokered an
unwritten deal whereby Matsushita would manufacture M2 units, while
Sega would concentrate on the software. M2 devkits were supplied to
Sega in early 1996, with initial work reputedly concentrating on a
Virtua Fighter 3 conversion for M2's launch.

Sega's M2 project soon fell apart however. 3DO's Trip Hawkins blamed
corporate 'egos' for the collapse, while Sega insisted its engineers
were unconvinced M2 was the breakthrough technology they needed.
Instead, the company was increasingly preoccupied by the PC market --
unlike Nintendo, it was fully prepared to convert its games onto the
format and in mid-1995 it had entered into a partnership with PC
graphics card manufacturer nVidia. Under the terms of the deal, Sega
would supply ports of key Saturn titles exclusively for the nVidia PC
graphics card. At the time, pundits wondered if Sega might be
switching from Saturn to nVidia as its principal platform.

By 1996, this speculation was ebbing away as two clear frontrunners
emerged in the PC graphics market: VideoLogic's PowerVR and 3Dfx's
Voodoo chipsets. Sega approached both companies to be partners in two
parallel Saturn 2 projects, each of which having minimal if any
knowledge of the other. The 3Dfx-Sega of America project was codenamed
Black Belt, while the VideoLogic-Sega of Japan system was known as
Dural. Although console development is usually shrouded in total
secrecy, Saturn 2's development coincided with the rise of the
Internet and Black Belt soon became a popular topic of gossip. For a
time, many presumed Black Belt was the only new Sega system.

All this changed on July 22nd, 1997, when 3Dfx was informed them Black
Belt was cancelled. It was a shattering blow -- "Our contract with
Sega was considered to be gospel right up until we received the call,"
admitted marketing manager Chris Kramer. Two months later, 3Dfx issued
a lawsuit against Sega while blaming VideoLogic's Japanese backers,
NEC, for bringing influence to bear on a decision which would
otherwise have gone to 3Dfx. An initial burst of publicity soon gave
way to highly confidential discussions which settled the lawsuit away
from the public eye in August 1998.

For outsiders, 3Dfx had always been the favoured partner due to their
leadership in the PC market, moreover Sega let it be known the
decision to cancel wasn't due to either performance or cost reasons.
What may have been a factor is 3Dfx's very strength made it a
difficult partner for Sega, VideoLogic's second-place status obviously
made it the hungrier partner. Moreover, whereas 3Dfx see themselves as
creating a new gaming platform around their Voodoo hardware and Glide
software, VideoLogic were much more eager to use Microsoft's Direct3D
API.

Whatever the reasoning behind the decision, the PowerVR decision
further dampened excitement about a machine soon to be redubbed
Katana. In January '98, UK trade newspaper CTW ran a savage onslaught
upon the new format: "When one looks at a format owner that actually
struggles to garner interest in its latest hardware announcements, you
know it''s in trouble. From Black Belt to Dural and Katana,
journalists have leapt into headline mode, but the level of
disinterest elsewhere is palpable." Commenting upon the latest
redundancies in America and Britain, Dinsey wondered whether the
company was "giving up and trying to re-invent itself as a PC
publisher."

In May, Sega gave its response with the official announcement of its
new system, its specifications and that controversial name: Dreamcast.
The marketing campaign began with the announcement of the marketing
campaign and its $100 million budget for each territory: America,
Europe and Japan. Sega boss Shoichiro Irimajiri put the cost of
hardware development at $50-80 million, software development at
$150-200 million, which with marketing added up to half a billion
dollars.

The PR statements were suitably bullish: "Dreamcast is Sega's bridge
to world-wide market leadership for the 21st century" commented Sega
US VP Bernie Stolar. "I am confident that Dreamcast will become a de
facto standard for digital entertainment" claimed Sega chairman Isso
Okawa. However, it was at E3 itself that the tide really began to turn
for Sega with bravura software demos finally earning the machine
journalists' respect. Post E3 reports were full of adoration , as
impressed by the restoration of Sega's old self-confidence as the raw
processing power on show. Dreamcast's launch date was set as November
20th and this time all Sony can threaten is the announcement of new
hardware -- 1998 is Dreamcast's alone.
From E3 onwards, Sega orchestrated a careful drumbeat of
announcements, including the launch of the VMS unit on July 11th to
tie-in with the Godzilla movie and a much hyped August 22nd PR event
for Sega's old mascot in Sonic Adventure. In September, Sega ran an ad
showing MD Eiichi Yukawa being abused by members of the public who
preferred Sony -- and promising all would change with Dreamcast's
arrival. And so it is, everything now rests with the machine and its
software.

Written By: Stuart Wynne

http://www.tinyurl.com/c5rk7
 
S

Scott H

Air said:
'A do-or-die machine which will decide whether Sega stays in the
hardware biz'
Sega boss Hayao Nakayama angrily berated Sega's engineers for their
failings, but it was too late to totally redesign the system if the
1994 launch was too proceed. Instead, Sega added yet another processor
to an already over-complicated design. In terms of raw power, the new
Saturn was much more of a match for PlayStation, but it would never be
an easy machine to program for. The twin CPU design in particular
demanded highly specialised machine code rather than the C most
Japanese developers prefered: barely a year after Saturn's launch a
key Sega manager admitted only one in a hundred programmers would have
the skill to use the machine's full potential.

Here it is again, who invented this idea that the Saturn wasn't
going to have 2 Hitachi CPUs prior to this? There is no resource that
backs this up. It is speculation entirely spawned by early 3rd party
Saturn titles looking worse than PS1 games, which we now know was an
issue of Development kits, not hardware. Any "history" which claims
this as fact is playing to the crowd, or asking the wrong people.
Sega's arcade games were exclusively 3D for at least the years the
Saturn was in development, there is absolutely nothing to support that
they were going to go with a 2D only system, with "mild" 3D
capabilities. Hell, the 32X even has 2 SH-2s in it. Sega's long
history of dual arcade boards is what spawned the Saturn, whether or not
it was "tweaked" after Sony's bloated PS1 specs were published.

Ironically, the Saturn's Japanese launch would be Sega's best ever
performance in its home territory. Even a flawed version of Virtua
Fighting was enough to transform the company's traditional weakness in
its home territory. Overseas, however, it was to be a different
matter. Scepticism about the prospects of a CD-ROM machine succeeding
in the cost-sensitive US market meant Saturn was originally partnered
with a low-cost, cart-based system codenamed Jupiter -- principally
due to American scepticism that a CD-ROM machine could be
competitively priced. When Saturn was upgraded, Jupiter got axed in
favour of Mars, an upgrade for Sega's 16bit Mega Drive which was
supposed to protect the company's hugely lucrative US market. In fact,
32X was an unmitigated disaster, drawing vital developer support away
from Saturn and destroying the company's reputation among gamers who
found themselves with an add-on with barely a handful of games.

Nobody bought a 32X, there were less than 500k ever made, and the
vast majority of them sat on shelves at $30 for years after its
discontinuation. Again, the theory that "gamers" were discouraged in
any way by the 32X is a story invented by game magazines and their ever
reliable slandering of the underdog, or undersupported console.

I wonder if anybody will every get off this kick of speculation and
hearsay and actually write a legitimate history on what happened in the 90s.
 
M

MrMearl-KCMO

As an oldschool gamer (or, old guy with big hands), I always felt that
what sunk the dreamcast was the wimpy logo and horribly configured
joypads.

The games/graphics were awesome, but my hands have never liked the
original controllers. If the controllers were good, I mighta bought one
just for Crazy Taxi. But, I couldn't even begin to control it in the
store.

That said, buying and playing the hell out of my ebay'd dreamcast
systems has been a blast.
 
M

Mojo JoJo

I was bitter against Sega for all the money I sunk in their upgrades. Sega
CD, 32X, and I was disappointed with the U.S. Saturn support. After hearing
about the Playstation 2, I decided to hold out. I didn't want to be screwed
out of money by Sega. Funny thing is, I ended up buying a Dreamcast and
never got a PS2. I just think a lot of us were bitter towards Sega by the
time the PS2 and Dreamcast were competing. I thought the PS2 would be the
end-all-be-all of systems, after seeing the Dreamcast in action, I was never
impressed by the PS2.

Mojo
 
P

polynonymous

MrMearl-KCMO said:
As an oldschool gamer (or, old guy with big hands), I always felt that
what sunk the dreamcast was the wimpy logo and horribly configured
joypads.

The games/graphics were awesome, but my hands have never liked the
original controllers. If the controllers were good, I mighta bought one
just for Crazy Taxi. But, I couldn't even begin to control it in the
store.

I feel your pain. The DC's controller was torture to my ogre-hands.
My index fingers cramp just thinking about the shoulder buttons.
That said, buying and playing the hell out of my ebay'd dreamcast
systems has been a blast.

Whatever its flaws, I still play my 7-year-old DC pretty regularly,
while my PlayStation and N64 have been collecting dust in storage for
years. I've almost gotten as much mileage out of it as I did the NES.
 
S

Scott H

I feel your pain. The DC's controller was torture to my ogre-hands.
My index fingers cramp just thinking about the shoulder buttons.

I hear this a lot, and I think I figured out that what people have been
doing wrong with the controller is squeezing it. Prior to the PS1, no
controller had prongs on the bottom that angled out, which is the angle
that your arms are naturally sitting at as they reach in for the
controller. So, with older controllers (i.e. NES, SMS, Genesis, Snes,
etc.) we always had to let the controller rest on our fingers while
playing with our thumbs. If you do the same thing with the DC pad, not
breaking the wrist to conform to the 90 degree angle of the plastic,
you'll have no problem, and your index fingers will reach the triggers
with no problem. If your wrists are bent 90 degrees because you're
squeezing the pad, nearly instant pain. I have the same problem with my
Nintendo DS, it's square, so if I get too into a game I'll squeeze it
and hold my hands at a sharp angle to my forearms.
 
F

furious gibbon

MrMearl-KCMO said:
As an oldschool gamer (or, old guy with big hands), I always felt that
what sunk the dreamcast was the wimpy logo and horribly configured
joypads.

The games/graphics were awesome, but my hands have never liked the
original controllers. If the controllers were good, I mighta bought one
just for Crazy Taxi. But, I couldn't even begin to control it in the
store.

That said, buying and playing the hell out of my ebay'd dreamcast
systems has been a blast.

i thought the logo was ok, it was a bit of a mistake to drop the
traditional SEGA logo because despite the failure of the 32x and saturn
it still was considered cool and techy.. the dreamcast startup sequence
was the best of the generation, it was fresh and non-fuss... the xbox
startup sequence makes me more and more furious every time i see it

the dreamcast pad was ok, the thumb stick was too sensitive though...
you can hold it in a way that the trigger don't give you cramps
 
N

NM Sees

Maybe it's just me, but this guy reds like Sony fan-boy.
=======================================
 
S

Scott H

NM said:
Maybe it's just me, but this guy reds like Sony fan-boy.
=======================================

It's not just you. I made a few critiques of his claims both times
this article has been posted here. There are blatantly false claims in
this article, it is obviously the work of the game media.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top