Officially, Microsoft's
No, it does *not* officially mean that. That "first half of 2008" is
an *estimate*, not a promise.
I don't mean to feed the trolls but, what exactly does the 1st half of
2008 mean? January 1st until June 30th is the 1st half of any year. I
don't know what calendar you own, but mine doesn't promise but
guarantees me that Jan 1st through June 30th will be the 1st half of
the year.
You do know it is well documented since at least 2005 of the release
date of SP3 and it continuously kept being postponed as Vista was
being hyped, pruned, plucked, scrapped, and then re-written again,
right? There are dozens if not a hundred tech, editorial, blog, and
news sites that have this fact historically documented. The Microsoft
Service Pack Road Map schedule web site has been updated MANY times
with the date change and release for SP3. The only fact one can garner
from that web site is that the SP3 date is "preliminary." Preliminary
is more an estimate and less of a promise.
Some historical information:
From Softpedia in 2007:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-XP-SP-3-Is-Dead-Long-Live-Windows-Vista-SP1-55518.shtml
From the Washington Post from October 2006:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/10/microsoft_delays_windowx_xp_se.html
From Dailytech, Jan 2006:
http://www.dailytech.com/Windows+XP+SP3+to+Set+Sail+in+2H+07/article325.htm
From the very respected Mary Jo Foley from Jan
2006:
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cont...t_until_2007.html?kc=MWRSS0%202129TX1K0000535
From CNET News.com from 2005:
http://www.news.com/Microsoft-confirms-next-XP-service-pack/2100-1016_3-5886274.html
No, there have been *no* pushed-back release dates. No date has ever
been announced. You are again confusing estimates with promises.
Personally I wish Microsoft would never publish these estimated dates.
All they do is confuse people, who too often treat them as promises.
Again, see above. By release date, I guess it cannot ever be said that
a specific *date* was give but release schedules were.
Don't blame Microsoft, blame their Executives and Management's lack of
competency in product and service delivery. Or just blame Ballmer
because he's the one who said it would ship before Vista on numerous
occasions. If, like the rest of us, you feel that SP1 for Vista will
actually make RTM Gold, then yes, if SP3 ships before Vista SP1, he's
not going to be a liar after all.
- Thee Chicago Wolf