There is no warning in XP Home Edition about this default Administrator Account being there.
No warning about it having no password, and that it has the ability to delete what is seen as
the only Administrative user account.
Having the choice to protect your computer is what this is about.
Having the chance to *maintain* you PC is what it's about, too.
It's part of a more general issue; that of the "null password
connundrum" that goes like this:
- "passwords are an optional feature"
- to set a new password, you first have to enter the old one
- so if no password, anyone can set one and lock you out
- so I guess passwords arn't as "optional" as claimed!
Passwords should be used only where a dangerous functionality is
needed for some users, but should be hidden from others. It is a weak
alternative to *removing* a dangerous feature that no-one needs, and
it is a needlessly dangerous alternative to leaving unfettered access
to a feature that everyone needs (risk of lockout).
XP Home is supposed to be for consumers. Users who need remote
administration and user management are supposed to use Pro.
Consumers already *have* a de facto security model they understand;
it's called "home", as in "a physical location where safety is
assumed". We expect anything within the home (i.e. with physical
access to the PC) to have unfettered rights, and anyone who does not
have physical access to the PC to have no rights at all.
Only if there's the desire to manage family members on the same PC
etc. (a doomed quest, IMO) does the need for passwords arise; or the
laptop situation, where theft is more likely than desktops.
Instead, consumers are expected to fall in line with the way corporate
world's professional IT departments manage computers. So they are
exposed to unneccessary "remote admin" risks (including that which
Lovesan/Blaster attacked), and they have to rely on passwords to
manage which should normally be always available or always impossible.
When it comes to the admin account you are referring to; that's
probably the consumer's lifeline in Safe Mode and Recovery Console
(RC). Kick it away, and you may well make it impossible to maintain
your PC if things go wrong, or recover data. As it is, you have to
set a couple of arcane things before RC can access all HD volumes,
copy files off HD, or use wildcards to do so in bulk.
IMO, it's time MS had the balls to tell coroprate sector to pay up for
Pro if they want the luxury of remote admin, and strip that garbage
out of Home so that Home really *is* developed for us consumers
instead of being a lamered version of designed-for-corporate software.
It's also time MS came up with proper maintenance tools for NTFS; a
maintenance OS that can run arbitrary anti-malware utilities,
diagnostics, file managers etc. without writing to the HD or running
any code off it, as well as an interactive file repair tool that is as
least as good as Scandisk (hint; Scandisk C: D: E: F
If the corporate world want to be so secure that these maintenance
tools cannot access the system, then that is yet another way in which
Home should be differentiated from Pro. We just want our data back!
---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Consumer Asks: "What are you?"
Market Research: ' What would you like us to be? '