M
Mike
This is very basic I suppose, but here is something I
THINK I have noticed as a difference between '95 and XP.
Those are the two I've used: with '95, I was able to save
the AOL emails that I wanted to keep by pasting them into
Wordpad. I would paste a long series of emails into one
file, and it was very convenient, much more so than having
them stuck individually in AOL's filing cabinet.
I haven't used Word, and for my letter writing, Wordpad
has been just fine. However, whereas in '95 the whole AOL
letter would save as I had copied it, header and all ...
in XP using Wordpad, oftentimes the text won't paste (same
thing sometimes if pasting something taken from a
webpage.) I don't know the difference between the four
choices in the dropdown menu, but I suppose 'Rich Text
Format' is the one to use. Anyhow, does anyone know of
there being some sort of difference in Wordpad's ability
to 'save' between '95 and XP. A minor thing, but it has
been annoying. Thanks for your time.
THINK I have noticed as a difference between '95 and XP.
Those are the two I've used: with '95, I was able to save
the AOL emails that I wanted to keep by pasting them into
Wordpad. I would paste a long series of emails into one
file, and it was very convenient, much more so than having
them stuck individually in AOL's filing cabinet.
I haven't used Word, and for my letter writing, Wordpad
has been just fine. However, whereas in '95 the whole AOL
letter would save as I had copied it, header and all ...
in XP using Wordpad, oftentimes the text won't paste (same
thing sometimes if pasting something taken from a
webpage.) I don't know the difference between the four
choices in the dropdown menu, but I suppose 'Rich Text
Format' is the one to use. Anyhow, does anyone know of
there being some sort of difference in Wordpad's ability
to 'save' between '95 and XP. A minor thing, but it has
been annoying. Thanks for your time.