Registerbackup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Renato
  • Start date Start date
R

Renato

Hi all,
i'm looking for a registrybackup and restore program.
I'm running W2K SP4.


--
///, ////
\ /, / >.
\ /, _/ /.
\_ /_/ /.
\__/_ <
/<<< \_\_ Regards Renato
/°)^>>_._\ Mailto: (e-mail address removed)
(/ \\ /\\\ Renato boycot Belgacom/Skynet
/ / \ \````
==((``==((``==
I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken
 
In bericht XUH7d.2818$gk.1447@okepread01,
(e-mail address removed) <[email protected]> schreef en ik citeer:

| Wayne D wrote:
|| In article <[email protected]>,
|| (e-mail address removed) says...
||
||| Hi all,
||| i'm looking for a registrybackup and restore program.
||| I'm running W2K SP4.
|||
|||
|||
||
||
|| ERUNT:
<snip>
Thank you all, I DL'd ERUNT and will try it.


--
///, ////
\ /, / >.
\ /, _/ /.
\_ /_/ /.
\__/_ <
/<<< \_\_ Regards Renato
/°)^>>_._\ Mailto: (e-mail address removed)
(/ \\ /\\\ Renato boycot Belgacom/Skynet
/ / \ \````
==((``==((``==
Some programming languages manage to absorb change but withstand progress.
 
Renato said:
Hi all,
i'm looking for a registrybackup and restore program.
I'm running W2K SP4.

Use the "Export Registry" feature of your RegEdit, but it won't do you
much good (neither registry backup will) when you can't access the
system any longer because something got screwed up really nasty, unless
your file system happens to be FAT32 (which I don't advise for security
reasons).

Dick
 
In bericht [email protected],
Dick Hazeleger <Dick@post_it_in_the_newsgroup.com> schreef en ik citeer:

| Renato wrote:
|
|| Hi all,
|| i'm looking for a registrybackup and restore program.
|| I'm running W2K SP4.
|
| Use the "Export Registry" feature of your RegEdit, but it won't do you
| much good (neither registry backup will) when you can't access the
| system any longer because something got screwed up really nasty,
| unless your file system happens to be FAT32 (which I don't advise for
| security reasons).
|
It's FAT32, and it will stay (i guess) FAT32.
Wich are these security reasons?


--
///, ////
\ /, / >.
\ /, _/ /.
\_ /_/ /.
\__/_ <
/<<< \_\_ Regards Renato
/°)^>>_._\ Mailto: (e-mail address removed)
(/ \\ /\\\ Renato boycot Belgacom/Skynet
/ / \ \````
==((``==((``==
Door: Something a cat wants to be on the other side of
 
Renato said:
In bericht [email protected],

It's FAT32, and it will stay (i guess) FAT32.
Wich are these security reasons?

Hi Renato,

For one, you can't use the "on-the-fly" encryption of the NT-based
system on a FAT(32) partition, a good second reason is that - because
of this - everything stored on that drive is a open as a magazine in
the library, and is accessible with any DOS boot floppy... even your
account info (think of the contents of "Documents asnd Settings")!

Another "security" aspect is the stability, NTFS is way more stable
than FAT32, and therefore is less prone to problems in the file system
(hardware errors excluded of course)

HtH

Dick
 
For one, you can't use the "on-the-fly" encryption of the NT-based
system on a FAT(32) partition, a good second reason is that - because
of this - everything stored on that drive is a open as a magazine in
the library, and is accessible with any DOS boot floppy... even your
account info (think of the contents of "Documents asnd Settings")!

An NT based boot CD (WUBCD) will accomplish the same thing for NTFS
volumns as a DOS boot floppy does on a FAT32 volumn, won't it?
Another "security" aspect is the stability, NTFS is way more stable
than FAT32, and therefore is less prone to problems in the file system
(hardware errors excluded of course)

I tried both with XP. I had some legacy problems running an older
commercial version of PGP with NTFS. That's the only difference I
noted.

I bought a newer version of PGP and run NTFS now, because it is more
stable, as I understand it anyway.

Talking encryption and security via a MS OS is pretty futile. These
attributes really require a heavy weight professional. As Gibson said,
"A false sense of security is worse than no security at all."

As far as backup goes, imaging or cloning with the WUBCD seems to be
the best option to me. Unfortunately, this requires a Win XP install
CD. It's an extremely handy tool if the OP can swing one.

For registry backup alone, a copy of a good reg can be copied back
using the CD, should something go really bad after an install,
uninstall, or registry cleanup.

http://windowsubcd.com/
 
Use the "Export Registry" feature of your RegEdit, but it won't do you
much good (neither registry backup will) when you can't access the
system any longer because something got screwed up really nasty, unless
your file system happens to be FAT32 (which I don't advise for security
reasons).

I'm just not getting around to the 911 Boot CD project:

http://www.911cd.net/downloads/#cdbuilder_v2

"This is the Windows version of the 911 CD Builder, it has the same
functionality as version 1.0 but with the familiar Windows interface
(it also runs correctly on the all the Windows versions
95/95A/95B/98/98SE/NT4/2000/XP)."

This one evidently works with Win 2000.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Back
Top