J
JDJ
I have 2 HP PC's, a Desktop 3ghz dual core 2gig RAM and a Notebook
3.4ghz P4.
The Desktop is Windows Media Center Edition 2005.
The Notebook is Windows Media Center Edition 2004.
I like to keep my software current, but know that each new operating
system is usually bigger, demands more system resources and can slow
down your existing hardware.
Neither machine feels fast to me.
I have ACT! 2007 which runs on SQL Server Express and is
hardware/resource demanding on any machine, especially a notebook with
only a 5,400 RPM hard drive.
What are the Reasons for / agonist upgrade to Vista from Media Center
Edition ?
I would probably not do a clean install.
In the past I put Windows XP on a P III machine that was running
Windows 98. I noticed some slow down but think the upgrade from
Windows 98 to XP made since.
Not so sure that would be the case going to Vista, which I know very
little about.
3.4ghz P4.
The Desktop is Windows Media Center Edition 2005.
The Notebook is Windows Media Center Edition 2004.
I like to keep my software current, but know that each new operating
system is usually bigger, demands more system resources and can slow
down your existing hardware.
Neither machine feels fast to me.
I have ACT! 2007 which runs on SQL Server Express and is
hardware/resource demanding on any machine, especially a notebook with
only a 5,400 RPM hard drive.
What are the Reasons for / agonist upgrade to Vista from Media Center
Edition ?
I would probably not do a clean install.
In the past I put Windows XP on a P III machine that was running
Windows 98. I noticed some slow down but think the upgrade from
Windows 98 to XP made since.
Not so sure that would be the case going to Vista, which I know very
little about.