Re MS's "anti-spyware" LOL! Sounds sooo funny!!!

[Semolina Pilchard]

Love is like the wild rose-briar,
Friendship like the holly-tree
The holly is dark when the rose-briar blooms
But which will bloom most constantly?

The wild-rose briar is sweet in the spring,
Its summer blossoms scent the air;
Yet wait till winter comes again
And who will call the wild-briar fair?

Then scorn the silly rose-wreath now
And deck thee with the holly's sheen,
That when December blights thy brow
He may still leave thy garland green.

Emily Bronte

Hmmm. Culture. Where did I leave my revolver?

 

[H-Man]

Okay whatever.
You posted that MS's anti-spyware program does not check all files. FYI,
neither does Spybot S&D. Seems to me that you kinda painted them with the
same brush, even though you say you had no intention of this. My
"verbosity" was intended to inform those that might not know that your
conclusion was based on assumptions only. Of course you did say that "it
appears that way to me". So I should appologise, you did, afterall, tell
the good people that you were only stating opinion, not fact.

You sneerilgly state what you purport to frame as derogratively - some evil
or terribly bad thing: ASSUMPTIONS! LOL! Everybody has them and
uses them EVERYDAY. Your posts are FULL of ASSumptions!
EVERY person, that includes YOU makes EVERY comment based on
ASSumptions! Get over it! There's no such thing as making ANY statement
without ASSUMPTIONS! You may deny it, or not recognize it, but
EVERY WORD FROM YOU MOUTH IS BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS -
just like [d]evolution's theory and the God of "science". There are legal
assumptions, "scientific" assumptions, and any other adjectvie you want to
dress them up in. Nonetheless, as 'the Bard' stated, "a rose by any other color'...

WOW, that'll teach me huh?
I didn't intend anything sneeringly, so if my "tone" was not in order here,
my appologies. I made no assumptions and based everything I said on your
dialog, but again, as I said in the last post, whatever! You are obviously
very sensitive to this subject so I'll just let it die, sorry I offended,
it was certainly not the intent. Just trying to set the record straight.
You obviously had good intentions, the fact that I questioned your methods
and results should not have started a flame war, perhaps I should be much
more gentle when raising doubt. I obviously read something in your first
post that you didn't intent to write, so I guess it's my bad, broad
shoulders and all that, eh?