Process Monitor latest version: queries

  • Thread starter Thread starter Terry Pinnell
  • Start date Start date
T

Terry Pinnell

I recently updated SysInternals ProcMon to 2.93.

Q1: When I run it while Process Explorer is also running, I cannot stop
it. Using Ctl+e displays the standard message and that remains until I
forcibly close ("...not responding").
Are the two programs unable to run together?

Q2: Why does it now take so long to 'stop'? My old version was almost
immediate.
 
Terry Pinnell said:
I recently updated SysInternals ProcMon to 2.93.

Q1: When I run it while Process Explorer is also running, I cannot
stop
it. Using Ctl+e displays the standard message and that remains until I
forcibly close ("...not responding").
Are the two programs unable to run together?

Q2: Why does it now take so long to 'stop'? My old version was almost
immediate.

Ask here....there are forums for both products:
Sysinternals Forums
http://forum.sysinternals.com/
 
~BD~ said:


BD

Why are you rehashing this Uniblue site if it is bonafide or not. Just 2 weeks ago
you went through the same exercise as you did 4 weeks ago and a few times before
that and now you are doing it again. How many people are you going to ask David.
Stop Trolling for Gxd's sake

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
 
I recently updated SysInternals ProcMon to 2.93.

Q1: When I run it while Process Explorer is also running, I cannot
stop it. Using Ctl+e displays the standard message and that
remains until I forcibly close ("...not responding").
Are the two programs unable to run together?

I can run Process Monitor and Process Explorer together without a
problem. PM capture can be started and stopped at will.
 
Nil said:
I can run Process Monitor and Process Explorer together without a
problem. PM capture can be started and stopped at will.

Thanks for checking. I wonder why I couldn;t do so? I'll have another try
tomorrow.
 
Back
Top