problem with subject

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linea Recta
  • Start date Start date
L

Linea Recta

It's happened to me more than one times.
Think I'm starting off a new thread by typing a (unique) subject, or at
least I thought so, and my message doesn't seem to show up!
After some research it seems my message was added to some (very old)
existing other thread with apparently the same subject.
Any way to avoid this problem?



--
regards,

|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os
 
Linea Recta said:
It's happened to me more than one times.
Think I'm starting off a new thread by typing a (unique) subject, or at
least I thought so, and my message doesn't seem to show up!
After some research it seems my message was added to some (very old)
existing other thread with apparently the same subject.
Any way to avoid this problem?



--
regards,

|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os
Click to expand...

Simply typing a "new phrase" in the "subject" line does not start a new post.
You have to first click on the icon for a "NEW POST", then the subject line should be blank for you.
 
Linea Recta said:
It's happened to me more than one times.
Think I'm starting off a new thread by typing a (unique) subject, or at
least I thought so, and my message doesn't seem to show up!
After some research it seems my message was added to some (very old)
existing other thread with apparently the same subject.
Any way to avoid this problem?
Click to expand...

Looks like you managed it this time :-)

Just do not use the obvious subjects, spell check - Help - windows mail etc
Try to make it unique?
 
mac said:
Looks like you managed it this time :-)
Click to expand...


Exceptional luck.

Just do not use the obvious subjects, spell check - Help - windows mail
etc
Try to make it unique?
Click to expand...


As long as there 's no verifying mechanism for this, it 'll remain a gamble.
And I don't like gambling.
But I suppose software engineers haven't thought about this one yet...


--
regards,

|\ /|
| \/ |@rk
\../
\/os
 
Linea Recta said:
Exceptional luck.




As long as there 's no verifying mechanism for this, it 'll remain a gamble.
And I don't like gambling.
But I suppose software engineers haven't thought about this one yet...
Click to expand...

Verifying mechanism for what?
The rest of us don't seem to have any trouble with this.
 
Back
Top