Piracy Solution?

L

Leythos

aka@ said:
$65 for XP Pro. Sounds pretty fishy to me.


From the web site:

"For all international orders, export, and distribution please contact
our sales force at:

800-800-8300
or
1-305-415-2201"

IOW, no online orders.

Plus:

" TigerDirect.com currently ONLY accepts international payment via wire
transfers. International credit cards and checks are not accepted. Note:
Wire transfer orders may be subject to an additional processing fee."

Do you have any idea how much an international wire transfer costs? Not
only that, they add an undisclosed fee.

Um, you haven't found any. Like I said, and you just proved, there are
no stores in the USA who will sell you XP online, unless you want to
trust a fishy web site like oem-software.org. Did you get that address
from one of your email spams?

Um, you didn't qualify it any more than what I found. I found two sites
in under 1 minute entering Windows XP OEM SPAIN INTERNATIONAL in a
google search, and while they may not be the best or perfect, they do
provide OEM software to your your local area - it appears you just want
to argue.
 
L

Leythos

aka@ said:
It's much more civilised than the USA, I assure you.

Only if you consider paying people to not harm you as being civilized.
Only of you consider screwing your customers as civilized (since they,
according to you, don't provide you with support like other OEM's do).
Only for a price. Gosh, you're ignorant of what happens outside the USA.


And that support would consist of what? Stop avoiding the question.

Call Dell or HP or IBM or any other vendor that has support and check
for yourself. If you can't imagine what OS support would consist of then
you should step out of the thread.
What a bargain is is not a scientific thing but a value judgment. YOUR
value judgment is comparing it to other OSs.

A bargain is based on relatives - your ability to afford it is based on
its cost and similar products costs. It has nothing to do with how much
money you have.
Where did you get that from?

You were the one that suggested the poor people stealing product would
be called thieves by some and would be fine by you, so, it would stand
to reason that you approve of poor people stealing what they need from
those that have it.

You said in another article, case you don't remember:
 
A

Alias

Leythos said:
Only if you consider paying people to not harm you as being civilized.
Only of you consider screwing your customers as civilized (since they,
according to you, don't provide you with support like other OEM's do).




Call Dell or HP or IBM or any other vendor that has support and check
for yourself. If you can't imagine what OS support would consist of then
you should step out of the thread.




A bargain is based on relatives - your ability to afford it is based on
its cost and similar products costs. It has nothing to do with how much
money you have.




You were the one that suggested the poor people stealing product would
be called thieves by some and would be fine by you, so, it would stand
to reason that you approve of poor people stealing what they need from
those that have it.

You said in another article, case you don't remember:


I rarely plonk people but I will make an exception with you. You are
only interested in attacking the persona and not addressing the issues
or content.

Have fun with Kurt; life is too short to deal with the likes of you.

Alias

P.S. I hope you are so poor one day that you're homeless. Maybe then you
would understand.
 
A

ANONYMOUS

If there was a 100% solution to piracy then most probably the software
company would go out of business!!

We know of Lotus 1-2-3 which had one of the best ways (relative to that
time period) to protect its intellectual properties but look what has
happened to it! M$ came and started distributing software for almost
nothing. Now there is no competion so Microsoft can invent new ways to
force people to buy multiple licenses when they are not actually needed
and charge whatever it wants.

This is life in a free democracy!
 
S

Sparda

I see the money and resources that Microsoft pump into
anti-piracy -
activation, etc, and I wonder if perhaps there is a far easier
way for them
to stamp out the appeal of pirate copies of XP. Why not
simply lower the
cost for personal use, perhaps even allow install on multiple
home PC's?
Let's face it, the primary reason that people turn to pirate
versions is the
cost - in Australia $479 for a copy of XP Pro is RRP, and
considering that's
$479 per PC what does a family with 2 or 3 computers choose,
full legal
versions or much cheaper pirated copies? The software alone
ends up costing
more than the damn computer, and that's just to get the
basics!!

Now, if MS were to strip away all the fancy packaging,
manuals, etc and just
pump out a CD with the user guide on the disc, I'm sure that
would help
reduce the cost, and if they then sold XP Pro or Home for
strictly personal
use at say $50, with the ability to install that on 5
computers (providing
all were based at the same address and strictly personal), how
many would
choose to risk using a pirate copy? I'd say that the number
of pirated
versions would drop dramatically if this was done, as who
wouldn't jump at
the chance to have a fully legal copy on ALL of their home
computers for
around $50, or even less??

Does this idea make any sense to others? I know MS need to
recover their
costs, etc, but given the extent they are going to to try and
get rid of
pirated versions, and given the number of pirated versions out
there,
wouldn't it be far better for them to just cut the cost and
then end up
selling heaps more copies????

OK - ready for the shoot down!! Or, if you agree - perhaps
forward onto Mr
Gates???? ;-)

I agree, there OS’s would be far more appealing if it didn’t cost
so much, and if it was licens per (say) house hold rather then per
computer (for example the TV licence, that is per house hold rather
then per TV). Although the OS would still have it’s instability,
flaws and general anoyances, at least it wouldnt have the anoyance of
making you bankrumpt at the same time. This applies to all there
software.

Every computer (thats is a IBM standared x86 and x86_64) needs an
operating system, and most peoples first choice is windows, so no
matter how much Microsoft (or should I say Micr$oft) charge, people
will pay for it. Even though Windows is arguably one of the worst
operating systems around.
 
L

Leythos

aka@ said:
I rarely plonk people but I will make an exception with you. You are
only interested in attacking the persona and not addressing the issues
or content.

What utter BS. I addressed the issue that was presented, you kept and
continue making excuses and nothing except excuses. You keep suggesting
that Piracy is OK if the pirates are poor, that we should accept theft
from poor people - you made those assertions, not me.

I stated that Windows XP Prof, at $140/$149 is a good buy when you
compare it to others of it's type on the market - you've been unable to
dispute that with anything that indicates I'm wrong.

What you've said, several times, is that people should be able to COPY
(steal) anything they can't afford.

I accept your plonk, since you feel the need to hide from your own
"theft is good if you're poor" statements.
 
K

kurttrail

Leythos said:
Nope, it was and is simple, OEM Windows XP Prof is about $140/$149 and
comes with support from the OEM. This cost is cheaper than some OS's
on the market if you purchase a 'support' provided version. There are
more Windows OEM's on the market than WalMart and there are plenty of
them that DO provide support. This means your argument is pure BS and
meaningless to this thread, as is normal from you.

No. I compare versions that software manufacturers provide the support.

You compare a version of a MS OS that MS doesn't support, but a 3rd
party OEM does sort of.

Most OEMs that do provide support that I've dealt with just blame MS and
don't do much of anything else.

But here it is simply.

You:

Red Hat OS / Red Hat support -> MSOS / 3rd Party Support sometimes

Apples -> Oranges

Me:

Red Hat OS / Red Hat support -> MSOS / MS support

And when you compare OS pricing with like kinds of support, MS is more
expensive. Then think that MS must sell a billion more copies than Red
Hat. MS pricing should be much less the Red Hat.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
K

kurttrail

ANONYMOUS said:
If there was a 100% solution to piracy then most probably the software
company would go out of business!!

We know of Lotus 1-2-3 which had one of the best ways (relative to
that time period) to protect its intellectual properties but look
what has happened to it! M$ came and started distributing software
for almost nothing. Now there is no competion so Microsoft can
invent new ways to force people to buy multiple licenses when they
are not actually needed and charge whatever it wants.

This is life in a free democracy!

No, this is life in a constitutional republic where corporate interests
have bought the politicians running the government.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
K

kurttrail

Leythos said:
What utter BS. I addressed the issue that was presented, you kept and
continue making excuses and nothing except excuses. You keep
suggesting that Piracy is OK if the pirates are poor, that we should
accept theft from poor people - you made those assertions, not me.

I stated that Windows XP Prof, at $140/$149 is a good buy when you
compare it to others of it's type on the market - you've been unable
to dispute that with anything that indicates I'm wrong.

What you've said, several times, is that people should be able to COPY
(steal) anything they can't afford.

I accept your plonk, since you feel the need to hide from your own
"theft is good if you're poor" statements.

Blow it out your ass, LameGirl.

MS is a proven IP thief. Most of the piracy that MS bitches about,
casual copying, MS has NEVER proven one case of in any court of law!

MS can even prove that they have been materially harmed in any financial
way due to the unsubstantiated claims of piracy, not with all the
billion in liquid assets that they have!

MS is a total hypocrite when it comes to IP theft. You are on the side
of a soulless corporate thief over that of real people that have NEVER
been proven to have done anything wrong at all!

YOU ARE TOTAL SCUM! YOU ARE A TRAITOR TO YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS!

;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
L

Leythos

YOU ARE TOTAL SCUM! YOU ARE A TRAITOR TO YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS!

Coming from you, I take that as a complement. If you had thought I was a
good person I would be worried.
 
K

kurttrail

Leythos said:
Coming from you, I take that as a complement. If you had thought I
was a good person I would be worried.

Of course you had to cut out my explanation for why you are scum and a
traitor to your fellow human beings, so I added back the context that
you tried to hide from!

<vbg>

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
L

Leythos

Of course you had to cut out my explanation for why you are scum and a
traitor to your fellow human beings, so I added back the context that
you tried to hide from!

I didn't hide from it - since it was off-topic, as most of your
messages, I just snipped it down to the part where you honored me.
 
K

kurttrail

Leythos said:
I didn't hide from it - since it was off-topic, as most of your
messages, I just snipped it down to the part where you honored me.

It was on the topic of Piracy, and MS's hypocritical stand, and your
betrayal of the human race, due to you siding with the known and proven
IP criminals, and blaming those that haven't been proven to have done
ANYTHING wrong!

Can you name ONE software company that has been put out of business due

to piracy?

Can you name ONE person that has EVER been found guilty of casual
copying of software?

If you cannot do either, then casual copy piracy is just the FUD of the

colluding members of the BSA. It's a god-damned fairy tale! And all
you are is the scumbag troll under the FUD bridge of the colluding
members of the BSA!

So shove that sideways up your ass, LameGirl! You are just an
anti-human being scumbag!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
P

Plato

kurttrail said:
Can you name ONE software company that has been put out of business due
to piracy?

There may be lots of little one-man outfits that stopped producing ware
due to nobody registering and/or people copying/distributing. It'd be
almost impossible to find those fellas now tho.
 
G

GregRo

Lowering the price will not change anything with piracy.
Price is simply another excuse thieves use to justify their stealing.
Thieves will steal at any price.
They would just need another excuse.


Even through I am against stealing.

Microsoft does not sale old operating systems or provide free
replacement.

If they sold older operating system at a price people could afford.
There would hardly be any piracy.

It cheaper to get a Linux operating system than windows or Mac
operating system (Except maybe for Suse and red hat pro)



Greg Ro
 
J

Jupiter Jones [MVP]

You said "I have no agenda other than defending my fellow human beings..."
But Kurt, I don't believe it anymore since you hope people you know nothing
about and have never met starve and dehydrate.
Or perhaps you do care about their computers but nothing of peoples physical
well being.

"Never say never. And treat with suspicion those that say it"
Does that mean "never" is always false, usually false or sometimes false?
For you, I will repeat:
I do not hate anyone and never will.
And never is a very long time.
Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant, it is true just the same.
You have to make assumptions to think I hate you or anyone else and your
assumptions are wrong.
Your assumption that I hate you is only in your imagination.

Thieves will steal because it is what thieves do.
Stealing is part of their character.
Lowering prices of windows will not change their character.
The solution for the thieves stealing is far beyond price.
Deal with their character instead of enabling them with another excuse of
price.
The right conditions have very little to do with price.
Or can you demonstrate people with the means to buy do not steal?

I have no need or desire to hate anyone.
Your apparent need to see hate in others may be indicative of your own
issues.
After all you are the one throwing personal attacks and insults at others
both directly and on your website.
That can be a strong indicator of hate.
Very few others need to attack and insult as you do.

Once you stop looking for hate, you may start seeing what is actually there.
 
K

kurttrail

Jupiter said:
You said "I have no agenda other than defending my fellow human
beings..." But Kurt, I don't believe it anymore since you hope people
you know nothing about and have never met starve and dehydrate.
Or perhaps you do care about their computers but nothing of peoples
physical well being.

I don't understand that. From where did you bring in starving and
dehydrating from, Juppy? I've experienced hunger, and dehydration, have
you?
"Never say never. And treat with suspicion those that say it"
Does that mean "never" is always false, usually false or sometimes
false?

It means distrust those that speak in absolutes. They are trying to
Bullsh*t you.
For you, I will repeat:
I do not hate anyone and never will.

Repeat it as many times as you need to, to confince yourself. You have
already proven your hate by your words and actions.
And never is a very long time.

And that you say never at all shows that all you are is a bullsh*tter.
Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant, it is true just the same.

ROFL! Your words and your actions make a lie of it all the same.
You have to make assumptions to think I hate you or anyone else and
your assumptions are wrong.

Keep repeating. Ever hear of "I think she doth protest TOO much."
You's be the "she."
Your assumption that I hate you is only in your imagination.

PROTEST WAY TOO MUCH!
Thieves will steal because it is what thieves do.

Theft is a property crime. Most cases of software piracy have nothing
to do with actual property.

That you cannot understand the difference between civil infringement and
property crime show how deluded you are.
Stealing is part of their character.

Whatever. And what is the percentage of the population you consider to
be crimanals. .01%, 1%, 10%, 25%, 50% . . . . more?
Lowering prices of windows will not change their character.

Real crimanal? Or those engaged in civil infringement? Personally, I
believe you think they are one in the same.
The solution for the thieves stealing is far beyond price.
Deal with their character instead of enabling them with another
excuse of price.

LOL! That is what the courts are for. Bring real thieves to court.
The right conditions have very little to do with price.
Or can you demonstrate people with the means to buy do not steal?

A very, very small percentage. For every Winona Ryder, there are tens
of thousands of rich people that don't go shoplifting.
I have no need or desire to hate anyone.

You do, if you think there is so many thieves all around! That software
infringement isn't effected by economic conditions!
Your apparent need to see hate in others may be indicative of your own
issues.

LOL! I'm not the one that thinks that civil software infringement is
the property crime of stealing.

I'm not the one that is so pessimistic and is refusing to see the
reality that economic circumstances effects the rate at which software
is infringed!
After all you are the one throwing personal attacks and insults at
others both directly and on your website.

LOL! Juppy the Borg is upset that he is shown as a drone of the
corporate copyright elite!

Then you should stop you nonsense about criminal theft, and start
talking about civil copyright infringement. But then you would have to
admit to yourself your lies.

You aren't man enough for that!
That can be a strong indicator of hate.

Lie to yourself all you want, Juppy. Whatever lies you need to get
yourself to sleep at night!
Very few others need to attack and insult as you do.

You feel attacked? ROFL! Poor baby Juppy! Bad man makes fun of you
for you lies that civil software copyright infringement is the criminal
property crime of theft!

Boo Hoo! said:
Once you stop looking for hate, you may start seeing what is actually
there.

LOL! Lies, Bullsh*t, and FUD. All motivated by hate of people, and
love for the corporate copyright elite.


Yep, changing the words of others, or lying that civil copyright
infringement is a criminal property crime, there is really no depths
that you will not sink to spread your anti-human pro-corporate copyright
elite lies, bullsh*t, and FUD!

http://microscum.com/jupiter

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
K

kurttrail

Plato said:
There may be lots of little one-man outfits that stopped producing
ware due to nobody registering and/or people copying/distributing.
It'd be almost impossible to find those fellas now tho.

There may be little green men living on Mars too.

But we have relatively very little information about life on Mars
compared to the information we have on businesses. If a company went
out of business due to piracy, you can be damned sure that the BSA would
be exploiting that information, no matter how small that business was.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
L

Leythos

It was on the topic of Piracy, and MS's hypocritical stand, and your
betrayal of the human race, due to you siding with the known and proven
IP criminals, and blaming those that haven't been proven to have done
ANYTHING wrong!

Yea, sanctimonious BS, you're good at that. I don't believe that anyone
violating the licensing agreements of any vendor has a "right" to do so,
not even for personal use. In all the documents you've presented, I've
never seen anything in those documents to support your personal belief
that people can use multiple copies installed on machines with the same
license against the vendors licensing agreement. Keep trying, I'm not
seeing it in anything you post - the documents you post clearly indicate
that persons are limited to the vendors licensing agreement.
Can you name ONE software company that has been put out of business due
to piracy?

I've seen small vendors that make shareware, and applications that only
cost $3, disappear after more than a year. Specific names, no, it
happens all the time.

Now, ask yourself this - what business of it is yours? Piracy is Piracy
and cuts into the Profits of the vendor, why is it ethical to SUPPORT
piracy?
Can you name ONE person that has EVER been found guilty of casual
copying of software?

No, the "people" that I know have always settled or been fired as a
result of it, so there were no official court cases. In their defense,
it was cheaper for them to pay a fine, license the software, or be
fired, rather than pay court/atty costs.
If you cannot do either, then casual copy piracy is just the FUD of the
colluding members of the BSA. It's a god-damned fairy tale! And all
you are is the scumbag troll under the FUD bridge of the colluding
members of the BSA!

Yep, and the world is really flat too. Just because no one has been
arrested for pealing oranges in a hotel room on Sunday in Phoenix does
not mean that the law can't be enforced. Just because YOU FEEL that it's
FUD doesn't make it FUD, but you keep trying, it makes you look good in
the eyes of the pirates.
So shove that sideways up your ass, LameGirl! You are just an
anti-human being scumbag!

Nice way to end your post, as immature as usual, and as long as you
dislike me I must be doing it right and honorably - thanks.
 
K

kurttrail

Leythos said:
Yea, sanctimonious BS, you're good at that. I don't believe that
anyone violating the licensing agreements of any vendor has a "right"
to do so, not even for personal use.

That's because you believe corporations have more rights than human
beings in their home.
In all the documents you've
presented,

You mean the passport-protected OEM documents that have nothing to do
with END USERS? LOL!
I've never seen anything in those documents to support
your personal belief that people can use multiple copies installed on
machines with the same license against the vendors licensing
agreement. Keep trying, I'm not seeing it in anything you post - the
documents you post clearly indicate that persons are limited to the
vendors licensing agreement.

It's called the way the law works.

SCO has alleged that IBM has violated the UNIX license. So has IBM
actually violated anything? No, it is for a court to decide, NOT SCO,
and NOT ME, and CERTAINLY NOTTTTT SO DUMB-ASSED SCHMUCK LIKE YOU!

Same as alleged MS EULA violations! Just because you, MS, or a Burning
Bush claims that something is a violation of the EULA, doesn't make that
legally true until proven by the preponderance of the evidence in a
court of law!

The difference between SCO and MS are numerous. SCO UNIX license was a
commercial use contract agreed to before any money exchanged hands.
MS's EULA is a commercial use contract that they have NEVER proven in a
court of law that it is also a PRIVATE-USE contract!
I've seen small vendors that make shareware, and applications that
only cost $3, disappear after more than a year. Specific names, no, it
happens all the time.

LOL! FUD! No names, therefore you don't even know why they went out of
Business! It could be that their code was just nothing anyone wanted to
use, for all we know!
Now, ask yourself this - what business of it is yours? Piracy is
Piracy and cuts into the Profits of the vendor,

Prove it! Hasn't touched the billions in the MS coffers!
why is it ethical to
SUPPORT piracy?

I'm not. I support proving REAL piracy in a real court of law, not the
unsubstantiated claims of piracy, that are never proven!
No, the "people"

I used "person," not "people."
that I know have always settled or been fired as a
result of it, so there were no official court cases.

LOL! Sound like you are talking about Businesses, not people!
In their defense,
it was cheaper for them to pay a fine, license the software, or be
fired, rather than pay court/atty costs.

Yep. You are talking about commercial use violations!
Yep, and the world is really flat too.

That is funny coming from you! No private use violation has ever been
proven at all, yet you believe that a post-sale shrinkwrap license
overrides a person privacy rights in their home, on absolutely no
evidence at all! You are the flat-earther!
Just because no one has been
arrested for pealing oranges in a hotel room on Sunday in Phoenix does
not mean that the law can't be enforced.

WHAT LAW! MS's EULA is not a law unto itself!
Just because YOU FEEL that
it's FUD doesn't make it FUD, but you keep trying, it makes you look
good in the eyes of the pirates.

No. It makes me a modern day champion of individual HUMAN rights. And
it makes you the pawn of the proven IP criminal, Microsoft. IP thief,
monopolist, and soulless colluding member of the BSA, and the corporate
copyright elit.
Nice way to end your post, as immature as usual, and as long as you
dislike me I must be doing it right and honorably - thanks.

I feel sorry for you, and I'm trying to wake you up, so that you can see
you are nothing but a coppertop stuck in the maze of the Matrix. But
you are happy being a mindless battery!

So to sum it up. YOU cannot name ONE COMPANY that has EVER been put out
of business due solely to piracy! YOU cannot name ONE PERSON that has
ever been charged with, let alone been found guilty of casual copying of
software! Yet you believe piracy is such a big problem!

Flat-Eather!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top