G
Guest
Hello all,
I have a new Vista (Home Premium) laptop and Office 2007 -- and I just
discovered this incompatible with my important ACT! program. ACT runs well
enough, but (1) won't word process, as it doesn't recognize Word '07, and (2)
won't email, as it doesn't recognize Outlook '07 -- with an inability for me
to put in Outlook '02, or Outlook Express, as I believe these uses would step
on each other.
These two functions are the heart of my need for ACT, writing letters and
email to client database -- and this is probably the single most important
use of my computer; so I have a bit of a problem. Upgrading ACT is not an
option as (1) nothing yet is written for Vista, and worse (2) the reviews on
the new ACT program are devastating, and most everyone highly recommends
staying away from it.
My question concerns partitions -- and perhaps, simply enough, a separate
"user" under Vista. Might these things be a work-around? One possibility that
I wonder about is to do a partition on my hard disk (100 G, RAID for
stripe/speed).. Perhaps to put in an XP OS with Word and Outlook '02. All
this would work, although I think it would be a bit cumbersome to log out of
one OS into another, just to do these functions. (As a secondary question, as
I seem to read in the posts, is it possible to access a second partition
right from the one user? Perhaps simply as reading the programs off of D:
instead of C:?)
A second question as possible work-around is, can I simply define a second
user? I.e., is it possible to load Office and Word '02 on User2, such that it
doesn't step on C:'s '07, and then use it from there? I couldn't figure out a
way to have Office '07 show up in User1, but not User2 -- and frankly was
afraid to load '02 into User2 until I understood the implications/problem
areas.
Can anyone suggest for me a good workaround? And if both work, can you
suggest what you feel is best, in terms of not having to switch users, etc.,
every time I want to use that program.
My goal is (1) get the program working; and then (2) get it conveniently
working. More important for me to simply get functional.
Thanks so much,
Don
I have a new Vista (Home Premium) laptop and Office 2007 -- and I just
discovered this incompatible with my important ACT! program. ACT runs well
enough, but (1) won't word process, as it doesn't recognize Word '07, and (2)
won't email, as it doesn't recognize Outlook '07 -- with an inability for me
to put in Outlook '02, or Outlook Express, as I believe these uses would step
on each other.
These two functions are the heart of my need for ACT, writing letters and
email to client database -- and this is probably the single most important
use of my computer; so I have a bit of a problem. Upgrading ACT is not an
option as (1) nothing yet is written for Vista, and worse (2) the reviews on
the new ACT program are devastating, and most everyone highly recommends
staying away from it.
My question concerns partitions -- and perhaps, simply enough, a separate
"user" under Vista. Might these things be a work-around? One possibility that
I wonder about is to do a partition on my hard disk (100 G, RAID for
stripe/speed).. Perhaps to put in an XP OS with Word and Outlook '02. All
this would work, although I think it would be a bit cumbersome to log out of
one OS into another, just to do these functions. (As a secondary question, as
I seem to read in the posts, is it possible to access a second partition
right from the one user? Perhaps simply as reading the programs off of D:
instead of C:?)
A second question as possible work-around is, can I simply define a second
user? I.e., is it possible to load Office and Word '02 on User2, such that it
doesn't step on C:'s '07, and then use it from there? I couldn't figure out a
way to have Office '07 show up in User1, but not User2 -- and frankly was
afraid to load '02 into User2 until I understood the implications/problem
areas.
Can anyone suggest for me a good workaround? And if both work, can you
suggest what you feel is best, in terms of not having to switch users, etc.,
every time I want to use that program.
My goal is (1) get the program working; and then (2) get it conveniently
working. More important for me to simply get functional.
Thanks so much,
Don