Number of files?

A

Alan Truism

What is the maximum number of files you can place in directory on MS
Servers?

I would like to know if there is a difference with regard to this, on
NT4, 2000, and 2003.
 
J

John John

What's with the crosspost to the alt.religion.dake-bonoism group? I'm
not crossposting there.

The amount of files that can be stored in a directory is dependent of
the file system used. The different NT versions will all have the same
limitations except that NT4 cannot read FAT32.

For FAT32 volumes the maximun number of files that can be stored in a
folder is 65,534. If you use long file names that number can be
reduced significantly, I've quite often seen FAT32 folders conk out at
20 to 25 thousand files.

If you are using NTFS file system the number of files that you can jam
in a folder is practically unlimited, if you're a stickler for exact
numbers you can stick 4,294,967,295 files on an NTFS Volume and they can
be stuffed in folders as you please.

John
 
J

James

John said:
What's with the crosspost to the alt.religion.dake-bonoism group? I'm
not crossposting there.

The amount of files that can be stored in a directory is dependent of
the file system used. The different NT versions will all have the same
limitations except that NT4 cannot read FAT32.

For FAT32 volumes the maximun number of files that can be stored in a
folder is 65,534. If you use long file names that number can be
reduced significantly, I've quite often seen FAT32 folders conk out at
20 to 25 thousand files.

If you are using NTFS file system the number of files that you can jam
in a folder is practically unlimited, if you're a stickler for exact
numbers you can stick 4,294,967,295 files on an NTFS Volume and they can
be stuffed in folders as you please.

John
For drill you loose one entry for every 13 characters in a long
filename. There also are fewer folders/entries available at the root
level than can be placed in an individual folder.

James
 
E

Edwin vMierlo

James,

can you point us to the documentation where you found that ?

( that = "you loose one entry for every 13 characters in a long filename"
and "There also are fewer folders/entries available at the root" )

thanks,
Edwin.
 
J

John John

For the folder entries at the root he's probably thinking of FAT16 which
has a limit of 512 directory entries in the root folder. NTFS and FAT32
do not have this limitation and can contain the same maximum number
files as other folders in the root folder. I should add however that it
is not recommended or advisable to store large number of files in the
root folder as it can cause problems with the system boot files.

As for the "every 13 characters" reference he is only partly right.
Files with 13 or more characters will use 3 (three) or more directory
entries, this applies to FAT16 or FAT32, but not NTFS.

John
 
E

Edwin vMierlo

thanks John.... I thought that was the case



John John said:
For the folder entries at the root he's probably thinking of FAT16 which
has a limit of 512 directory entries in the root folder. NTFS and FAT32
do not have this limitation and can contain the same maximum number
files as other folders in the root folder. I should add however that it
is not recommended or advisable to store large number of files in the
root folder as it can cause problems with the system boot files.

As for the "every 13 characters" reference he is only partly right.
Files with 13 or more characters will use 3 (three) or more directory
entries, this applies to FAT16 or FAT32, but not NTFS.

John
 
J

James

Edwin said:
thanks John.... I thought that was the case
That is one of the problems with being from the valve days,
pre-transistor. Yes it was from the early fat days. Sorry about the
neuron glitch to the past.

James
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top