NTFS Disk Formatting

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hearaoi
  • Start date Start date
H

Hearaoi

Is there a rule of thumb to estimate the NTFS formatted
size of a hard disk as a percentage of its nominal size?
If you can tell me that, Great; If you can expand your
answer to include FAT32, so much the better.
Thanks,
Hearaoi
 
In
Hearaoi said:
Is there a rule of thumb to estimate the NTFS formatted
size of a hard disk as a percentage of its nominal size?
If you can tell me that, Great; If you can expand your
answer to include FAT32, so much the better.



Yes, the rule of thumb is the same in both cases: it's 100%.

If you're seeing a discrepancy between the size the drive
manufacturer claims for it and what Windows reports (for example
80GB vs 74.5GB), it has nothing to do with formatted vs
unformatted size.

All hard drive manufacturers define 1GB as 1,000,000,000 bytes,
while the rest of the computer world, including Windows, defines
it as 2 to the 30th power (1,073,741,824) bytes. So an 80 billion
byte drive is actually a bout 74.5GB.



Some people point out that the official international standard
defines the "G" of GB as one billion, not 1,073,741,824. Correct
though they are, using the binary value of GB is so well
established in the computer world that I consider using the
decimal value of a billion to be deceptive marketing.
 
-----Original Message-----
In



Yes, the rule of thumb is the same in both cases: it's 100%.

If you're seeing a discrepancy between the size the drive
manufacturer claims for it and what Windows reports (for example
80GB vs 74.5GB), it has nothing to do with formatted vs
unformatted size.

All hard drive manufacturers define 1GB as 1,000,000,000 bytes,
while the rest of the computer world, including Windows, defines
it as 2 to the 30th power (1,073,741,824) bytes. So an 80 billion
byte drive is actually a bout 74.5GB.



Some people point out that the official international standard
defines the "G" of GB as one billion, not 1,073,741,824. Correct
though they are, using the binary value of GB is so well
established in the computer world that I consider using the
decimal value of a billion to be deceptive marketing.
Ken,
Thanks. I ordered a 60GB drive in my laptop. Windows calls
it 52.8 GB. The calculation that you present yields a
manufacturer's size of 56.7GB. There's a 3.3GB difference
that I thought might be explained by the loss due to
formatting. I know the 60GB is nominal, but I expected
actuality to be very close to 60GB, maybe even a smidgeon
above. Thanks,
Hearaoi
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

ntfs v fat32 24
Partition Size Limit for Fat32 14
Converting from FAT32 to NTFS 3
Your XP mybe a Fat32 13
NTFS or FAT32 ? 22
NTFS to Fat32 10
formatting with exfat 5
How to format thumb drive as NTFS? 4

Back
Top