So not just a printer, but an all-in-one. _If_ you have the space, I'd
second what someone said about having separates. (Because when one dies
you have to replace both, or keep something that's only half working, in
which case you're using the space anyway.) Also most all-in-ones do a
head cleaning cycle (which uses up some ink) each time you turn them on
- even if you're only doing so to scan. (Or do such a cycle periodically
if you just leave them turned on.)
Out of curiosity, which part died - the printer, the scanner, or the
lot?
In fact, you _might_ be able to get either a scanner or a printer - or
both - for free, just for the trouble of collecting it; when all-in-ones
first appeared, many people just put their separates away in the attic
or whatever, and might be glad to give them away to someone who'd use
them. Though that's been the case for long enough now that people may
have had clearouts.
(That threw me too, but see below.)And I wish they didn't, or at least didn't default to it. I don't
_think_ I've seen a scanner driver that didn't have the _capability_ to
save in one of the standard image formats, at least TIFF, but many -
especially those intended for the more professional market (use by less
computer-savvy folk) - _default_ to PDF, which their users then use.
Thus there are lots of scanned documents about - even single page - that
are in PDF, which are a right pain.
Might be referring to having OCR-capability but this would be
through a software application supplied with the all-in-one
printer.
Indeed. Such as Omnipage, pixyy (that's not quite right, but there is
one common one that ends in two ys), and others. If you have this
software installed on your computer, you should be able to use it with
any replacement scanner you buy - if you're lucky it will link into a
scanner driver, but even if not it will have the capability of importing
images (possibly in TIFF or even PDF). So don't let the presence or
absence of .doc format output affect your choice of scanner.
The "print photos in various formats" is also an aspect of the software
used to do it, rather than anything particular to the printer; I find
good old (free) IrfanView does most things well. You'd (assuming you
want to print drafts at lower quality than the printer is capable of,
for reasons of speed and ink saving) need to be able to tweak those, but
that should be provided as settings in the printer _driver_ - accessible
each time you print from any software, and the default settable (should
be the same interface) from Settings | Printers. (I usually set the
default to be draft, and amend at the actual printing stage on the rare
occasions I want final quality.)
If by "print ... in various formats" you mean to include direct from
memory card, then I suppose that is something you'll have to look for,
though I don't think the extra convenience would for me compensate for
the severe limitations I'm sure it imposes over being able to do it from
the computer (card readers for PCs cost peanuts - I've seen them in
poundshops and on ebay - and your PC may have them anyway [I've known
people with laptops who didn't _know_ they had one, as it's hidden away
underneath or similar]).
If you do go for new, I'd endorse what someone said about laser: inkjets
are expensive to run and tend to clog if unused for even quite a short
time. If I ever buy another new printer to replace my Brother inkjet
(for which I get cartridges from UKDVDR), it'll probably be a laser. And
you _can_ get all-in-ones that have a laser in them. (The one I use at
work is a marvellous machine, but I suspect costs well into four figures
- it's floor-standing, and can do A3 double-sided colour, and serves as
a photocopier!)