Mark said:
...I'm interested in your comments and suggestions.
Mark;
Your site,
http://www.backupschool.com/, loads quickly and is easy to
navigate. Visually, things seem a little crowded but I thinks that's
because of the number of items listed in your TOC column. Overall, it's
definitely a function-over-form design style that I appreciate a lot.
Wrt the content itself: the two articles I read (recommendations:
backup for individ & backup for lan), are clear and easily understood.
But, your editorial decision not to discuss backups (vs your preferred
method of imaging) is going to disappoint a fair amount of potential
readers.
Especially considering your website's moniker.
This becomes a bit of a linguistic headache as you do start using the
terms interchangeably. But on to the "crux of the biscuit" (as the
illustrious Dr. F. Zappa would say). Drilling down to your actual
recommendations for "backup," I find only options which require $$$.
In general, this is an easily digestable site (bandwidth and prose)
which promotes imaging as a backup strategy. If one is already an
advocate of imaging over backups or would like to understand the
distinction, this site can be useful.
Two omissions in the site's discussions keep me from bookmarking it.
There is no coverage of backup/imaging in a heterogenous or non-windows
situation and more surprisingly (considering the group in which you
posted): Freeware and/or Open Source are not mentioned *once*.
"Recommending"
Overall, very good start. But to be a reference that I'd pass along to
clients & family members, it'd need to treat the above-mentioned
deficiencies.
hth,
-Craig