Originally there was one table of "equipment".
Fields included 6 different types of equipment: cable, wire, conduit,
hardware, signal, misc. Fields included the different sizes that "could" be
ordered.
Ok, I see 6 fields here, or maybe a couple more if you have a primary
key. I don't see 256 fields. What is the actual STRUCTURE of your
table?
Since there cant be multiple tables on a form, what about just splitting the
database in two parts. Almost like 2 independent databases in one.
Well, you obviously don't need two DATABASES - two .mdb files; just
two forms. If that's acceptable to the users then by all means, go for
it.
One form is used for the input of the data - yes they put ALL fields on one
form - listed in six different columns. They want to be able to have an
overview of all equipment to be ordered on a particular job. They actually
print the form to use as a reference for each job. Then there are reports
that use querries for each part type.
This can of course be done very easily with a normalized database. But
I understand that the timecrunch you're in may forbid that.
Invalid braketing of name '[forms!frmreportsmenu!txtrptbegindate]'
I simply copied the sql from the other querrie and the braketing is correct.
If I can resolve that issue then I think I may have this licked.
The bracketing is in fact incorrect. Each part of the name needs its
own brackets:
[forms]![frmreportsmenu]![txtrptbegindate]
John W. Vinson[MVP]