You are not following the thread. Read PA Bear's message to see the links to
the tests I am talking about.
Well those tests all pass MSE with flying colours. Still waiting to see if
there are any more comments from the group.
Which tests?
I have easily dispensable systems I get infected on purpose to help me
understand how things happen and to learn how fix them. Idon't sit
around and wait for something to happen, I go looking for it.
If somebody has malicious software on their system, I want to know how
they got it so I can get it too, then I can fix it easier the next
time I see it without trying things and wasting time. I will get a
system infected and see which product fixes it in the least unpleasant
manner.
I don't even try MS products anymore to see if they will protect the
system or are capable of detecting anything after the system has
already been infected.
Th MS products might work or they might not, usually not for things I
see, so I don't even bother anymore since it will likely be a waste of
time. I am tired of saying "Well, MS didn't detect anything, now let
me try this". I don't do that anymore. Sometimes folks have the
opinion that if it comes from MS, it must be good.
MS is probably adequate for some environments, but I need to take the
worst environment possible and find something that will work there.
If it does, then it will usually also simple things that befuddle or
go unnoticed by MS. It is not their specialty. Somebody once said
even a broken clock is right twice a day...
I prefer to go with things that will give me the best chance of
preventing, detecting, resolving the issue with the highest degree of
certainty with the least amount of effort.