Hardly.
Do you seriously expect MS to be able to correctly detect code that YOU
modified and that YOU compiled? They are many things but mind readers ain't
one of them. The only really stupid people out there are those that think
they're far too clever to get infected... there is no perfect user, no
perfect system set-up, no software that is guaranteed to keep you safe.
Their BETA [remember, that means its in development and they're throwing it
open to CONSTRUCTIVE criticism and feedback?] software is a step forward and
I for one welcome anyone trying to combat spam...
Jog on...
David
"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
Thinks Explorer.exe is spywear. The file it claims is a copy of Explorer.exe
and has the same resources in it (string tables, menus) as the real
Explorer.exe. It thinks it's something called little witch ftp server. I
needed some files to test a For command on and copied the exes from Windows
to c:\.
The other hit is something it claims is advertising spywear (I compiled this
program myself from MS sample code that I modified - it's a/ deleted and b/
DOES not (or didn't) serve ads - it deleted selected text from web pages.
2 false hits from 2. That is a 100% error rate.
Plus the offensive behaviour of telling me I'm infected. You can only get
infected if one is stupid.
--
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.uscricket.com
Frank Saunders said:
It didn't do that on my machine, although I have version 5.6.0.8820
--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP, IE/OE
Please respond in Newsgroup only. Do not send email
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Protect your PC
http://www.microsoft.com./athome/security/protect/default.aspx