Microsoft Releases Changelist for Upcoming XP SP2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris Lanier
  • Start date Start date
Maybe he is in a different time zone?

Chris Lanier said:
Please fix your clock. You are one hour off.

Matt said:
Microsoft Releases Changelist for Upcoming XP SP2
from the times-they-be-a-changing dept.
posted by simoniker on Thursday December 18, @05:30 (microsoft)


As we know from independent sources, Microsoft is busy
[0]readying Service Pack 2 for Windows XP. They have published on their
website a [1]changelist document (link goes to TechNet download page)
detailing the nature of the security-related fixes and updates. The
document is targeted towards XP admins and covers some interesting things
such as the new Internet Explorer Pop-up Manager and various security
policy changes. Some other juicy tidbits from the document: Internet
Connection Firewall will be enabled by default, and there will be new
support for something called "Execution Protection" which allows
developers to make use of the NX (no execute) page guard flag on Intel's
Itanium and newer AMD processors. An interesting read."

Links:
0. http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5120138.html?tag=nefd_pop
1.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tr...et/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/winxpsp2.asp
 
Doesn't matter. The time will be displayed in your local time on your
machine. If his time is off it will display off on your end. He posted at 10
pm and it displays as 11pm on my end telling me his clock or time zone is
off. If his clock is right, his post time will match my local time on my
machine.
Maybe he is in a different time zone?

Chris Lanier said:
Please fix your clock. You are one hour off.

Matt said:
Microsoft Releases Changelist for Upcoming XP SP2
from the times-they-be-a-changing dept.
posted by simoniker on Thursday December 18, @05:30 (microsoft)


As we know from independent sources, Microsoft is busy
[0]readying Service Pack 2 for Windows XP. They have published on
their website a [1]changelist document (link goes to TechNet
download page) detailing the nature of the security-related fixes
and updates. The document is targeted towards XP admins and covers
some interesting things such as the new Internet Explorer Pop-up
Manager and various security policy changes. Some other juicy
tidbits from the document: Internet Connection Firewall will be
enabled by default, and there will be new support for something
called "Execution Protection" which allows developers to make use
of the NX (no execute) page guard flag on Intel's Itanium and newer
AMD processors. An interesting read."

Links:
0. http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5120138.html?tag=nefd_pop
1.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tr...et/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/winxpsp2.asp
 
Microsoft Releases Changelist for Upcoming XP SP2
from the times-they-be-a-changing dept.
posted by simoniker on Thursday December 18, @05:30 (microsoft)


As we know from independent sources, Microsoft is busy
[0]readying Service Pack 2 for Windows XP. They have published on their
website a [1]changelist document (link goes to TechNet download page)
detailing the nature of the security-related fixes and updates. The
document is targeted towards XP admins and covers some interesting things
such as the new Internet Explorer Pop-up Manager and various security
policy changes. Some other juicy tidbits from the document: Internet
Connection Firewall will be enabled by default, and there will be new
support for something called "Execution Protection" which allows
developers to make use of the NX (no execute) page guard flag on Intel's
Itanium and newer AMD processors. An interesting read."

Links:
0. http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5120138.html?tag=nefd_pop
1.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tr...et/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/winxpsp2.asp
 
While the security fixes are important, I'm hoping that SP2 also fixes many
of the functionality bugs in XP, such as a virtually-unusable/undependable
search utility.

I shouldn't have to depend on a third-party free program, such as Agent
Ransack, to ensure I am finding files -- and the contents of files -- that I
am looking for, and that I am unable to locate by using the native XP
Windows Explorer.

And, please, please. let's hope the talented MS techhie gurus manage to get
rid of the ~ file that appears on the desktop each time that I edit or
update my OE address book.

Alan
 
And, please, please. let's hope the talented MS techhie gurus manage to
get
rid of the ~ file that appears on the desktop each time that I edit or
update my OE address book.

Don't know where I saw it (probably an OE NG), but there is a fix for this.
 
Scott said:
Don't know where I saw it (probably an OE NG), but there is a fix for
this.

Telling people "There's a fix somewhere, but I don't know where" is like
telliing a man dying in the desert from lack of water that "there is a water
fountain somewhere, but I don't know where it is."
 
No fix yet. MS is still working on it.

Tom
| > And, please, please. let's hope the talented MS techhie gurus manage to
| get
| > rid of the ~ file that appears on the desktop each time that I edit or
| > update my OE address book.
|
| Don't know where I saw it (probably an OE NG), but there is a fix for
this.
|
|
 
Knowing that something is possible is the first step to wisdom. I guess you
aren't there yet.

If I tell you that I know there is a fix for this problem, you (well not
actually you, because we now know that you need us to present the solution
to you on a silver platter) could, oh I don't know....go to google.com or
msdn.microsoft.com or an OE newsgroup and perhaps....ummmm....search for it
yourself?

Oh. yes, and you could even say something like "Thanks. I thought I was
stuck with this behavior, but now I can get off my butt and locate the fix
you mention and have my problem solved.

"Your welcome."
 
I'm sorry that I don't have the actual reference for you, but there IS
indeed a fix for this.
 
Alan said:
While the security fixes are important, I'm hoping that SP2 also fixes many
of the functionality bugs in XP, such as a virtually-unusable/undependable
search utility.

I shouldn't have to depend on a third-party free program, such as Agent
Ransack, to ensure I am finding files -- and the contents of files -- that I
am looking for, and that I am unable to locate by using the native XP
Windows Explorer.
Explorer is a very bad file manager.
There are other problems besides.
Even with all the options unchecked, some folders are not visible.
Actually, I don't use Explorer anymore because it LIES about folder
contents.

IF IE was showing something else than the real content of a web page,
people would be furious that MS was screwing up the content of a page.
But nobody seems to be annoyed by the fact that Explorer shows
another "reality" of their disk. I can't trust a program which
deliberately lies and MS will not prevent me to see what's going
on with my data. I'm speaking about index.dat files, for instance.
And then, this :
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=318872

"By default, Windowx XP sorts numerals in strings that are contained
in file and folder names according to their numeric value. "

Why the hell do they change that ? Without any mention, of course.
Try to create some files with numbers in their name like this

This is the sort in 2K
Ie4_01
Ie4_128
Ie401sp2
Ie5
Ie501sp2
Ie6

This is in XP
Ie4_01
Ie4_128
Ie5
Ie6
Ie401sp2
Ie501sp2


I quit Explorer a long time ago and I use Total Commander, the best
file manager. http://www.ghisler.com
Pierre.
 
Scott said:
Knowing that something is possible is the first step to wisdom. I
guess you aren't there yet.

If I tell you that I know there is a fix for this problem, you (well
not actually you, because we now know that you need us to present the
solution to you on a silver platter) could, oh I don't know....go to
google.com or msdn.microsoft.com or an OE newsgroup and
perhaps....ummmm....search for it yourself?

Oh. yes, and you could even say something like "Thanks. I thought I
was stuck with this behavior, but now I can get off my butt and
locate the fix you mention and have my problem solved.

"Your welcome."

You are nothing but abrasive and unhelpful. Your whitewash is useless.
Either help the OP, or shut up..
 
You are nothing but abrasive and unhelpful. Your whitewash is useless.
Either help the OP, or shut up..

Oh yes, I think we can all see who is abrasive and unhelpful. LOL
 
Oh, and by the way, it took about 45 seconds to locate this using Google:

http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/10/Technology/Solutions__Error_mean.shtml

And anyone who got my information that there IS indeed a fix for this would
have only needed to spend those 45 seconds on Google to find their answer.
This IS helpful information.

Your reply, blasting me for not holding your hand and wiping your nose is
NOT helpful to anyone here. It's always someone like you, who turns a
thread into a personal war that makes these newsgroups really SUCK
sometimes. It's also why many people don't post on the newsgroups, because
they don't want to have to endure endless drivel from the likes of people
like you.

Have a nice day.
 
Scott: I read the URL you provided. I think it should be classified more of a "work-around" rather than a fix. Until MS fixes it ;-)

Tom
 
Now, we are splitting hairs. It makes the problem go away, yes?


Tom Pepper Willett said:
Scott: I read the URL you provided. I think it should be classified more
of a "work-around" rather than a fix. Until MS fixes it ;-)
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top