"Longhorn"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rich
  • Start date Start date
R

Rich

Is the next-version of Windows, code-named "Longhorn," based on XP? Or will
it be a completely different species?
-Rich
 
Windows Code Name: Longhorn is based apon Windows XP. Code Name: Longhorn
will offer many advances from Windows XP including DVD Burning, a new GUI,
new versions of Outlook Express and Windows Messenger, along with additions
to IE. Many things will be different from what you see now in XP. IE
"might" include a Download Manager and Popup Blocker.

NOTE: All features subject to change before 2006 when Windows Code Name:
Lognhorn will be released.
 
Is the next-version of Windows, code-named "Longhorn," based on XP? Or
will
it be a completely different species?

I think some things will be based on XP, but for the most part, it's its own
creature. It will have the XP "look and feel", but more so...the new Aero
interface promises to be colorful, in the way that XP's was when compared to
Win98. Also, it will be built on the NT kernel I believe, lending itself to
comparisons with XP, as opposed to 98. From waht I understand though, it's
going to be a dramatic difference, and will probably serve the user better
to make no comparisons at all and draw conclusions based on Longhorn itself,
not how it fares when compared to XP. That said, if you have to compare it
to something, compare it to XP.
 
Since when was it a "Code Name"? Is it a top secret
government project?
 
| Is the next-version of Windows, code-named "Longhorn," based on XP? Or will
| it be a completely different species?

It basically sounds like an XP upgrade (XP-SE?). Don't look for anything even
remotely near as great a difference as there was from WinME to WinXP. Time will
tell whether there's really anything that qualifies it as a worthwhile upgrade
for the standard user.

Larc



§§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§
 
It's so diffrent that you can slipstream it right into XP
Pro. Now if thats a whole new program I'am from
mars.......lol same problems - diffrent name
 
OMG, we have to learn to kill the messenger all over again...that should be good for
a few thousand posts when it comes out.
 
| OMG, we have to learn to kill the messenger all over again...that should be good for
| a few thousand posts when it comes out.

LOL! And gang up to beat hell out of anybody who claims the emperor is naked!
;-)

Larc



§§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§
 
Larc said:
It basically sounds like an XP upgrade (XP-SE?). Don't look for anything even
remotely near as great a difference as there was from WinME to WinXP. Time will
tell whether there's really anything that qualifies it as a worthwhile upgrade
for the standard user.

Jim Eshelman has a page now that links a lot of articles and information
http://aumha.org/win5/a/longhorn.htm

A lot of the changes are concerned with a new interface system for
developers, but it appears that there is also intended to be a new
graphics system based on vector rather than bit map methods. Plus file
system additions based on content. And who knows what as yet in the
user GUI?. Central kernel probably much the same
 
Bill Gates said yesterday that it will offer computer users robust security
and let them more easily search for files spread across varying programs.
A unified file storage system will let users search for information regardless
of whether it resides in email, spreadsheets or word processing documents.
Another new feature is a vertical panel on the side of the screen that includes
essential infomration at a glance, such as the time and date, instant messenger
buddy lists, links to web sites, and stock prices. He said Microsoft is
banking on dramatic improvements in processing power by 2006 to support
Longhorn's features.

I can hardly wait :-(
 
| Larc wrote:
|
| >
| >It basically sounds like an XP upgrade (XP-SE?). Don't look for anything even
| >remotely near as great a difference as there was from WinME to WinXP. Time will
| >tell whether there's really anything that qualifies it as a worthwhile upgrade
| >for the standard user.
|
| Jim Eshelman has a page now that links a lot of articles and information
| http://aumha.org/win5/a/longhorn.htm
|
| A lot of the changes are concerned with a new interface system for
| developers, but it appears that there is also intended to be a new
| graphics system based on vector rather than bit map methods. Plus file
| system additions based on content. And who knows what as yet in the
| user GUI?. Central kernel probably much the same

Interesting reading. Thanks, Alex.

There is an article in this morning's eWeek about the presentation at Microsoft
Professional Developers Conference yesterday. Everybody was given a copy of the
existing alpha, so eWeek had a chance to put early Longhorn through some of its
paces.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1364971,00.asp

Frankly, I still haven't heard much that will strongly benefit the average home
user. Longhorn's IE will have a download manager and popup blocking, but
Mozilla already has both. Longhorn is 2 or 2½ years away, but adding those two
features right now would amount to playing catchup. There are apparently no
plans for tabbed browsing for IE, another very useful feature that Mozilla has.

As for WinFS, it sounds great for commercial users and others who need access to
files from multiple computers on a network. But for most home users?

I haven't given up yet, though, and am still patiently waiting to be dazzled!

Larc



§§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§
 
Larc said:
I haven't given up yet, though, and am still patiently waiting to be dazzled!

What will it do for me? All I need to do is read email and usenet, surf,
use wordpad, and run an old html editor?
 
As regards WinFS, imagine being a home user with hundreds or thousands of
digital photographs on your PC.
If you attach some metadata to the pictures and folders (like this flooder
contains mike 6th birthday and this other folder contains mikes 7th
birthday, you could organise viewing your photos by "show me all of mikes
birthday pictures arranged by age"
Or if you actual fill in the properties on documents you write you can build
queries to build views of all documents about something and those that are
related to that thing.

This are just simple scenarios - and in some cases you can say I organize my
documents about things by folders, but what if you did not have to
understand about folders and files ? and just wanted to view your documents
arranged by whatever you felt relevant and could then join these views to
display the data in other ways. Add to this an ability to intelligently
"index" the files of way more types then just a document and you begin to
see the advantages of a more intelligent file system.

--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top