Logitech MX1000 bluetooth mouse laggy under Vista?

[kony]

Are you suggesting an unrelated product with a different
problem somehow bears on a different disagreement?

[...a couple dozen lines of rationalization snipped.]

LOL! The OP's problem and the OP's product are suddenly irrelevant?

Yes, irrelevant to what you'd implied with your comment.

YOUR mouse lags. You're just oblivious to it, apparently.

His report of "lagginess" in his original post is what prompted
you to reply "...ALL CORDLESS MICE have an observable lag" and
started the disagreement.

Yes, there is lag inherant in the design and then there's a
much larger lag when the product isn't working
optimally-as-designed due to poor reception.

Did you really think if you just kept disagreeing it would
counter the observations of many many people of many many
different products in many many different scenarios?

It would seem you just can't perceive the difference.
Denial doesn't change anything (and it won't the next time
you err, either).

 

[kony]

Nice snip.

Sore looser.

 

[Rod Speed]

Even though this thread has turned into some sort of personal
slagging match between kony and UCLAN, I have kinda solved the
problem -- if anyone's interested... I have used a USB extension
lead to put the dongle higher up... problem solved. Cheers all.

Gee, it wasn't a fault of the device at all.

Hear that, Kony?

Are you suggesting an unrelated product with a different
problem somehow bears on a different disagreement?

[...a couple dozen lines of rationalization snipped.]

LOL! The OP's problem and the OP's product are suddenly irrelevant?

Yes, irrelevant to what you'd implied with your comment.

YOUR mouse lags. You're just oblivious to it, apparently.

YOU claimed you can detect the lag but its easy to claim.

Yes, there is lag inherant in the design

You aint even established that, just CLAIMED it.

and then there's a much larger lag when the product isn't
working optimally-as-designed due to poor reception.

Did you really think if you just kept disagreeing it would
counter the observations of many many people of many
many different products in many many different scenarios?

Yep, just like it does with all those fools that claim to have
seen aliens, werewolves, yetis, fairys, leprechaums, etc etc etc.

It would seem you just can't perceive the difference.
Denial doesn't change anything (and it won't the next time
you err, either).

The same stupid claim is made by fools that claim to have
seen aliens, werewolves, yetis, fairys, leprechaums, etc etc etc.

 

[Rod Speed]

Sore looser.

Pathetic tighter.

 

[UCLAN]

Sore looser.

You've earned the nick-name of "ostrich." You continue to stick
your head in the sand and snip the portion of my post that shows
you posted irrelevant URLs. Quite desperate, I must say.

 

[UCLAN]

Even though this thread has turned into some sort of personal slagging
match between kony and UCLAN, I have kinda solved the problem -- if
anyone's interested... I have used a USB extension lead to put the
dongle higher up... problem solved. Cheers all.

Gee, it wasn't a fault of the device at all.

Hear that, Kony?

Are you suggesting an unrelated product with a different
problem somehow bears on a different disagreement?

[...a couple dozen lines of rationalization snipped.]

LOL! The OP's problem and the OP's product are suddenly irrelevant?

Yes, irrelevant to what you'd implied with your comment.

Get a clue, ostrich. You just can't admit that your "ALL CORDLESS MICE
have an observable lag" comment was in error.

YOUR mouse lags. You're just oblivious to it, apparently.

Oblivious to it because it has no lag. Gee, I've only been using it
for 2+ years. Any lag would have presented itself by now.

Admit you are wrong. You'll feel better.

 

[kony]

kony wrote:

Even though this thread has turned into some sort of personal
slagging match between kony and UCLAN, I have kinda solved the
problem -- if anyone's interested... I have used a USB extension
lead to put the dongle higher up... problem solved. Cheers all.

Gee, it wasn't a fault of the device at all.

Hear that, Kony?

Are you suggesting an unrelated product with a different
problem somehow bears on a different disagreement?

[...a couple dozen lines of rationalization snipped.]

LOL! The OP's problem and the OP's product are suddenly irrelevant?

Yes, irrelevant to what you'd implied with your comment.

YOUR mouse lags. You're just oblivious to it, apparently.

YOU claimed you can detect the lag but its easy to claim.

.... as can others. The disagreement seems to center around
the fact that when one person can't discriminate a lag, but
others can, it must not exist.

Some people can detect CRT monitor flicker at 90Hz too,
while many people can't. This is only the subjective
peception, not even counting the use which would reveal a
lag when rapid and precise movements are needed like when a
professional is doing image editing or a gamer is aiminga
weapon.

I'm somewhat amazed that you can't accept it, this is pretty
common knowledge in gaming circles.

 

[kony]

You've earned the

Again, you have no chance of winning an argument against
someone who has several of these cordless mice and can
perceive the difference, as well as having ample evidence of
others who can too.

 

[kony]

Admit you are wrong. You'll feel better.

You really don't have a clue do you?

 

[UCLAN]

Again,

See? I can snip, too.

For anyone interested, just read:

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Ya can't snip the archives. <g>

 

[UCLAN]

You really don't have a clue do you?

Kony - http://www.jpbutler.com/franklin-park-zoo/ostrich-front.html

 

[kony]

Kony -

I think it's safe to say there's nothing else constructive
coming out of this, if you want the last word then go ahead.

 

[kony]

See?

See what?