L
Leythos
I just got a cheap intel board and 2.66ghz Dual Core CPU to play with.
The CPU has 1x2MB cache, does not have Hyper Threading, but is a retail
version. The board is a cheap board (don't remember the model and I'm
not near it), was about $119 for it.
I also bought a cheap $59 PCIe card with 128MB RAM for the board as it
doesn't have onboard video.
In testing between my P4/3.2ghz with a AGP8x Radeon and 1GB RAM, playing
GuildWars at 1280x1024, the slower Dual Cure 2.66ghz and cheaper video
card has smoother graphics and no stutter.
I mention this because the P4 machine/board was more than twice the cost
of the Dual Core parts, not to mention the cost of the AGP card being
about $200 vs the PCIe card at $59.
I've not had time to do any benchmark testing, but the game seems to
indicate that the Dual Core is a winner so far.
The CPU has 1x2MB cache, does not have Hyper Threading, but is a retail
version. The board is a cheap board (don't remember the model and I'm
not near it), was about $119 for it.
I also bought a cheap $59 PCIe card with 128MB RAM for the board as it
doesn't have onboard video.
In testing between my P4/3.2ghz with a AGP8x Radeon and 1GB RAM, playing
GuildWars at 1280x1024, the slower Dual Cure 2.66ghz and cheaper video
card has smoother graphics and no stutter.
I mention this because the P4 machine/board was more than twice the cost
of the Dual Core parts, not to mention the cost of the AGP card being
about $200 vs the PCIe card at $59.
I've not had time to do any benchmark testing, but the game seems to
indicate that the Dual Core is a winner so far.