hammerhead13 said:
Is there a Version of NTBackup for Vista with Write Capabities?
I saw this on the net but is it real:
http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/New-Improved-NTBACKUP-Program.html
hammerhead13,
That article was written while Vista was in beta. More important, the
author's choice of terminology is not very precise and might be misleading.
You will recall that ntbackup.exe was the filename for the built-in backup
and restore applet for Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows XP. The author
should not have referred to Vista's Backup and Restore function as NTbackup.
I found conflicting info about using the ntbackup.exe file and its related
..dll files on Vista, but I had always used ntbackup, and learned to like it.
I eventually found a method of using ntbackup.exe on Vista that appears to
work, but without the ability to schedule a backup job. I was never
comfortable with the reliability of using this method, no longer use it, and
do not recommend it.
I want to back up by folder, and I want to include executables and sometimes
inactive "system" files as part of what I call my software library, so
Vista's backup applet was never sufficient for me.
I worked with the Windows Live OneCare betas and RTMs just to use its
similar but more customizable backup component. It worked well, and
reliably, and I have no complaints about it except that you can't install
just the backup portion of OneCare-- you get the whole suite or nothing.
When OneCare version 2.0 surprised and disappointed many users by suddenly
reverting to a less customizable (Vista-like) backup scheme, where you could
no longer choose folders or include executable files, I knew I could no
longer use OneCare, for backups, at least.
Along came Microsoft's SyncToy. I had ignored it for years, based solely on
its silly name. (I didn't want a "toy!") As it turns out, SyncToy 2 (beta)
is JUST what I've been wanting all along. I use it to "contribute" copies of
my files to a separate internal or external HD. It doesn't catalog or
compress the files, which is my preference. It's customizable to the degree
I need, and can be scheduled using the Windows Task Manager (which I do not
need to do). It's fast and seems very reliable. I like the simple but modern
interface.
I recommend that you try it and see if it suits you. Let us know.
Brian
(If Microsoft if "listening," please consider changing its name from SyncToy
to SyncTool, or similar.)