Is the Professional Look Really Better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Horrillo
  • Start date Start date
[cool! another alt-tard with no language skills]
We're they tearing you down, or the site?
Click to expand...
In other words, what you're (or should I say "your" so you don't get
confused by a contraction) trying to say is...
"We are they tearing you down, or the site?"

WTF does that mean?

Bob Lehmann
 
While sitting in a puddle SmakDaddy scribbled in the mud:
My boss Allis is a, on again, off again, reg in here.
Here, they all tell her her site(s) are purly turrible.
There's a regular in aww called Duende that calls her site(s) absolutely
evil!
Click to expand...
It is!
She put his picture on the wall here.
Click to expand...

She's a masochist. Moose lady thrives on abuse.
 
Sounds like yo're the one who's trolling for an argument.
Correctomundo. I love teasing the trolls. Just don't throw your poop at me.

<phttt>yo're</phttt>.
I know how much you alt-tards love details in an argument. Now please learn
to spell.

PS - Love your websites. Obviously not from a template - That amount of
inadequacy could only be achieved by meticulous attention and intervention
by an alt.webmaster.

Bob Lehmann
 
They do. We all have a common distaste for the alt-tards.

Bob Lehmann

William Tasso said:
[top-post is intentional to inflame the alt-tards]
[jumping on minor whoopsies is also intentional]
...
Click to expand...

cool - bet your neighbours love having you around.
Click to expand...
 
Bob: I love it when you've got spunk!

Looks like you have several dozen alt-tard posts to reply to ;-)

Tom
|I love this stuff ! These guys are such IDIOTS!!!
|
| 14 year-old slashdotters (come back when you have some hair, boy) and COLA
| rejects, thinking they're presenting a convincing argument by pouncing on
| the most idiotic details - ooooh, you top-posted so you're a dumbass.
|
| I'm just waiting for one of them to say that their dad can out-grep
someone
| else's dad, or crow about the latest tweak the made they to distro
| 1.4.3.2.5.6.7 of Linux so they could run a mainsteam printer.
|
| <bait type="flame">Windows - It just works</bait>
|
| Bob Lehmann
|
| | > You're late, Bob. Been expecting you much sooner ;-)
| >
| > Tom
| > | > | [cool! another alt-tard with no language skills]
| > |
| > | >We're they tearing you down, or the site?
| > | In other words, what you're (or should I say "your" so you don't get
| > | confused by a contraction) trying to say is...
| > | "We are they tearing you down, or the site?"
| > |
| > | WTF does that mean?
| > |
| > | Bob Lehmann
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > | > | > >
| > | > > The thing that I find so interesting is that my site is such a
| source
| > of
| > | > > interest to all of these folks who have absolutely no interest in
| > | > FrontPage.
| > | > > You see, their purpose is to pump themselves up by trying to tear
| > other
| > | > > people down. That works with immature and insecure people such as
| > | > > themselves. It doesn't work with me. Even so, it has certainly
| been
| > an
| > | > > interesting study in the immature nature of the alt.* groups.
It's
| > been
| > | > > years since I've wandered into that realm, and I see that things
| > haven't
| > | > > changed.
| > | >
| > | > Pump themselves up by tearing others down?
| > | > We're they tearing you down, or the site?
| > | > If it's the site, then you're personalizing it ;)
| > | > /usr/bash
| > | >
| > | > My boss Allis is a, on again, off again, reg in here.
| > | > Here, they all tell her her site(s) are purly turrible.
| > | > There's a regular in aww called Duende that calls her site(s)
| absolutely
| > | > evil!
| > | >
| > | > She put his picture on the wall here.
| > | >
| > | > In other words <include=chill pill>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
 
I love this stuff ! These guys are such IDIOTS!!!

14 year-old slashdotters (come back when you have some hair, boy) and COLA
rejects, thinking they're presenting a convincing argument by pouncing on
the most idiotic details - ooooh, you top-posted so you're a dumbass.

I'm just waiting for one of them to say that their dad can out-grep someone
else's dad, or crow about the latest tweak the made they to distro
1.4.3.2.5.6.7 of Linux so they could run a mainsteam printer.

<bait type="flame">Windows - It just works</bait>

Bob Lehmann
 
Then you've got a lot of catching up to do. I look forward to reading your
replies over the next few days!!!

Tom
| I'm also hoping to be a part of the history-making, world's longest
thread.
|
| Bob Lehmann
|
| | > You're late, Bob. Been expecting you much sooner ;-)
| >
| > Tom
| > | > | [cool! another alt-tard with no language skills]
| > |
| > | >We're they tearing you down, or the site?
| > | In other words, what you're (or should I say "your" so you don't get
| > | confused by a contraction) trying to say is...
| > | "We are they tearing you down, or the site?"
| > |
| > | WTF does that mean?
| > |
| > | Bob Lehmann
| > |
| > | | > | >
| > | > | > | > >
| > | > > The thing that I find so interesting is that my site is such a
| source
| > of
| > | > > interest to all of these folks who have absolutely no interest in
| > | > FrontPage.
| > | > > You see, their purpose is to pump themselves up by trying to tear
| > other
| > | > > people down. That works with immature and insecure people such as
| > | > > themselves. It doesn't work with me. Even so, it has certainly
| been
| > an
| > | > > interesting study in the immature nature of the alt.* groups.
It's
| > been
| > | > > years since I've wandered into that realm, and I see that things
| > haven't
| > | > > changed.
| > | >
| > | > Pump themselves up by tearing others down?
| > | > We're they tearing you down, or the site?
| > | > If it's the site, then you're personalizing it ;)
| > | > /usr/bash
| > | >
| > | > My boss Allis is a, on again, off again, reg in here.
| > | > Here, they all tell her her site(s) are purly turrible.
| > | > There's a regular in aww called Duende that calls her site(s)
| absolutely
| > | > evil!
| > | >
| > | > She put his picture on the wall here.
| > | >
| > | > In other words <include=chill pill>
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
 
We don't need any more people with your attitude in my neck of the woods.

As in "you shor got a pretty mouth" neck of the woods?
da-da-daa-daa-da-da-daa-daa-daa
Thanks, but I think I'll steer clear of yore neck of the woods, Jethro.
Greywyvern
Click to expand...
Is wyverns anythin' like wimmens? And, why do you like 'em grey? Is the
yung'ns too hard to catch it them?

Bob Lehmann
 
Well, I certainly hope you've learned a valuable lesson from all of this.
You must be getting hungry, then.

Bob Lehmann
 
--
which way is up?
Click to expand...

So, William Sausage, you do realize that you actually have to type something
besides a sig when you reply, don't you?

Or are you seeking direction in the proper use of a toilet in order to avoid
getting your hair wet?

Bob Lehmann
 
Tina said:
I'd like to know if anyone has any real evidence that having a picture of
the site owner actually makes a difference? I've heard this before, but
most people that claim it makes a difference added their picture at the same
time they drastically updated/polished/redesigned their websites. Any real
statistics on this?
Click to expand...

My guess would be that it's the sort of thing that is entirely case by
case. It depends on your marketing strategy and branding. For instance it
would work with Affordable Host because much of the marketing is word of
mouth and personal recommendation, and because the branding tends towards
the personal and low key. It wouldn't work for Google, or even The Probert
Encyclopaedia.

Like anything else on a site, if it isn't helping to achieve the aim of
the site then it shouldn't be there.

However, I'm not a big fan of "marketing by numbers". Mileage may vary.
 
That's a good reply to a toppost... ;-)
Yeah, wow! I'm amazed at the finesse you alt-tards are able to muster when
you're crunched - Real grace under pressure.

How is it that you are able to come back with such intelligent responses
under such adverse conditions?

Bob Lehmann
 
OH CRAP!!! I misquoted!!! I'm dead meat now. The alt-tards will be all over
this one.

what I meant was....
Well, I learned not to feed the trolls.
Click to expand...
You must be getting hungry, then.

Bob Lehmann
 
Jim said:
Is that really your logic?
Click to expand...

No. It's yours.
I don't think redesigning a Web page that uses inline frames so that it
renders well in Opera even compares, but then that's just me.
Click to expand...

Opera supports inline frames just dandy. Since version 3.6x I think.
Certainly since 5.x.
 
I can't see the difference between having a pic of the site owner or the CEO of a big corp? Besides...how would anyone know who the pix is of...as long as it's not something cheesy...like Chris in his Winnie the Pooh jammies :-)
 
Actually it's a MS Office XP T-shirt I won from the T-shirts for tipsters
contest. ;-)

--
Chris Leeds,
Microsoft MVP-FrontPage

ContentSeed: great tool for web masters,
a fantastic convenience for site owners.
http://contentseed.com/
 
William said:
Ugh - that sounds like a weak argument for not delivering a usable,
accessible web site.
Click to expand...

That's just so laughable to me. My site has been extremely successful over
the past seven years. The proof is in the pudding as they say.

Humility would suit you nicely, as it would for many others who are flaming
in this thread. By any chance do you have a personalized license plate on
your vehicle? Wouldn't surprise me.

--
Jim Cheshire
JIMCO
http://www.jimcoaddins.com

Now offering templates ranging from
affordable standard templates to
powerful e-commerce applications!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

CMS Versus FP 40
How to reference a document without the .htm 3
No CSS Option In Themes 6
Using Frames and Robot File 8
Two Different Ways Form Validation Errors Display 2
New link not showing. 7
Poor Webmaster Personal Sites 175
Lost Navigation Structure! 3

Back
Top