H
Howard Kaikow
In another thread, I point out that I've not had success upgrading Win 98 to
Win 2000 on a system that already was triple boot, but that's a subject for
the other thread. In the process of doing this, I managed to get as far as
the win 2000 install creating an Upgrade Report.
Currently, Win 98 is on C, Win 2000 is on F, created as clean install, and
Win 2000 is on G, cloned from Win 2000 on F..
Most of the problems it reports fall into the following categories:
1. I have to replace certain of the Win 98 programs/drivers with Win 2000
equivalents, which I already have in Win 2000 on F and/or G.
2. Drivers will need to be installed for certain devices not
installed/available under Win 98, e.g., an NTFS USB hard drive, but are
installed in Win 2000 on F and G.
3. Report complains about some things installed in Win 2000 on F or G,
likely because Win 98 does not know what they are.
It is clear that the Win 2000 install is not designed for systems that are
already multiple boot. It would nice if we could have an option to make it
so.
All of the above is likely not a problem, since Win 2000 is already running
on the hardware, however, I am concerned about the "Backup Files found"
category which, in part, states:
"Setup found files on your computer that appear to be a backup of part of
Windows 98. During the upgrade to Windows 2000, Setup removes Windows 98
from your computer, including any backups you may have on your hard disk."
The Setupact.log file lists the affected directories, but does not specify
the files.
In this case, many of those file are in a cloned Win 98 directory, so
removal would break the clone. I could live with that, as I do intend to
eventually retire win 98.
In other cases, the files are in the Program Files directories for Win 2000
on F and G, nothing at all to do with Win 98 on C, of course, the install
cannot know that, but it could ask, n'est-ce pas?. I sure don't want those
files to be automagically deleted, it doesn't seem to make sense to do so.
The last large category of such critters are files that were distributed
with books such as the VBA Developers Handbook. Win 2000 has no business
deleting such files. Again the install should ask.
Are these problems avoided by doing a clean install?
I sure hope so.
Back in June 2000, when I first installed win 2000, the upgrade report
listed only a few files that were distributed with books.
I guess that I did not notice this problem back then, so I do not know
whether any files were deleted when I installed Win 2000 on F as a clean
install. Win 2000 was installed on G by cloning from the Win 2000 on F, a
painful process that I do not really wish to go thru again,
Is cloning the only way to protect files from being needlessly deleted?
I sure wish there was a way to upgrade Win 98 on a multiboot system, and not
needlessly delete files that the install has no business looking at.
Win 2000 on a system that already was triple boot, but that's a subject for
the other thread. In the process of doing this, I managed to get as far as
the win 2000 install creating an Upgrade Report.
Currently, Win 98 is on C, Win 2000 is on F, created as clean install, and
Win 2000 is on G, cloned from Win 2000 on F..
Most of the problems it reports fall into the following categories:
1. I have to replace certain of the Win 98 programs/drivers with Win 2000
equivalents, which I already have in Win 2000 on F and/or G.
2. Drivers will need to be installed for certain devices not
installed/available under Win 98, e.g., an NTFS USB hard drive, but are
installed in Win 2000 on F and G.
3. Report complains about some things installed in Win 2000 on F or G,
likely because Win 98 does not know what they are.
It is clear that the Win 2000 install is not designed for systems that are
already multiple boot. It would nice if we could have an option to make it
so.
All of the above is likely not a problem, since Win 2000 is already running
on the hardware, however, I am concerned about the "Backup Files found"
category which, in part, states:
"Setup found files on your computer that appear to be a backup of part of
Windows 98. During the upgrade to Windows 2000, Setup removes Windows 98
from your computer, including any backups you may have on your hard disk."
The Setupact.log file lists the affected directories, but does not specify
the files.
In this case, many of those file are in a cloned Win 98 directory, so
removal would break the clone. I could live with that, as I do intend to
eventually retire win 98.
In other cases, the files are in the Program Files directories for Win 2000
on F and G, nothing at all to do with Win 98 on C, of course, the install
cannot know that, but it could ask, n'est-ce pas?. I sure don't want those
files to be automagically deleted, it doesn't seem to make sense to do so.
The last large category of such critters are files that were distributed
with books such as the VBA Developers Handbook. Win 2000 has no business
deleting such files. Again the install should ask.
Are these problems avoided by doing a clean install?
I sure hope so.
Back in June 2000, when I first installed win 2000, the upgrade report
listed only a few files that were distributed with books.
I guess that I did not notice this problem back then, so I do not know
whether any files were deleted when I installed Win 2000 on F as a clean
install. Win 2000 was installed on G by cloning from the Win 2000 on F, a
painful process that I do not really wish to go thru again,
Is cloning the only way to protect files from being needlessly deleted?
I sure wish there was a way to upgrade Win 98 on a multiboot system, and not
needlessly delete files that the install has no business looking at.