Installer/uninstaller

  • Thread starter Thread starter inobugs
  • Start date Start date
I

inobugs

I'm looking for a freeware installer/uninstaller program that will
track installations so the files may be safely uninstalled and will
backup programs upon uninstallation to prevent loss or permit recovery
of critical files, e.g. [*.dll] etc. Is anyone aware of a program for
this purpose? Thanks.
Dan
 
Opp's.

MyUninstaller
59 Best Free Program Un-installer
http://www.techsupportalert.com/more/extended.htm
http://members.lycos.co.uk/nirsoft/

Safarp
http://wistinga.sourceforge.net/safarp/

PUI
http://support.it-mate.co.uk/?mode=Home
http://www.webgrid.co.uk/system_5.html
http://www.webgrid.co.uk/index.html

Easy Uninstaller
http://www.sixfiles.com/dbase/system-utilities/system-maintenance/page3/go.php
http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?page=59&cat=007
http://www.freeware-alternative.uni...nsataller/free-software-easy-uninstaller.html

FingerPrint
http://www.2brightsparks.com/freeware/freeware-hub.html
http://www.2brightsparks.com/assets/software/FingerPrint_Setup.zip

InstallSpy
http://www.tucows.com/preview/337007.html
http://www.webattack.com/freeware/system/fwmonitor.html
http://www.mjleaver.com/Software/software.htm

Smart Buster
http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?page=26&cat=007
http://www.rovatronick.onestop.net/SmartBuster.htm

COA32
http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/os/Win9x/util/

JoneSoft Uninstall Cleaner ( Freeware )
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/...air_Utilities/JoneSoft_UnInstall_Cleaner.html

Add Remove Pro ( Freeware )
Win95, Win98, WinME, WinNT 4.x, WinXP, Windows2000
http://superwin.com/freeware.htm
http://superwin.swmirror.com/adrmpro2.exe
http://www.sover.net/~wysiwygx/WinUtils1.html
http://sonofspy3.spymac.com/Sofffffffware2.html
http://www.sover.net/~wysiwygx/Sofffffffware2.html
http://www.all4you.dk/FreewareWorld/links.php?cat=007
http://www.pricelessware.org/thelist/sys.htm

jv16 PowerTools 1.3.0.195, which doesn't expire, is available here:
http://spazioinwind.libero.it/puntocr/dwl/jv16pt_setup.exe
http://down.hengshui.com/download.asp?downid=1&id=726 .

Microsoft uninstallers
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q238/4/13.ASP
http://download.microsoft.com/download/office2000pro/util22/1/W9X/EN-US/msicu.exe

Smart uninstaller
http://yippee.i4free.co.nz/html/win/utilities/title6760.htm
http://www.yippee.net/isapi/download.dll?isp=4&software=6760

UnClean
http://www.blindprogramming.com/ftp/useful/

Total Uninstall
http://freewarewiki.pbwiki.com/TotalUninstall
http://www.geocities.com/ggmartau/
http://www.geocities.com/ggmartau/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/ggmartau/download/download.html
http://www.webattack.com/get/totaluninstall.shtml
http://www.webgrid.co.uk/system_2.html
http://www.webgrid.co.uk/index.html
http://www.pricelessware.org/thelist/sys.htm

Manually Uninstalling a Program
http://surecool.net/manuninst.htm

ZipInstaller
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/zipinst.html

ZSoft Uninstaller
http://www.zsoft.dk/index.php?goto=software

InCtrl5
http://www.devhood.com/tools/tool_details.aspx?tool_id=432
http://members.tripod.com/sbcserv/downloads.htm
http://www.idicalif.com/scripts3/hf8.idc?teamkey=IDIBASE
http://www.filelibrary.com:8080/cgi-bin/freedownload/Multi-Platform/n/105/inctrl5.zip

InstallWatch
http://www.epsilonsquared.com/
http://www.epsilonsquared.com/installwatch.htm

InstallRite
http://www.epsilonsquared.com/
http://www.epsilonsquared.com/installrite.htm

FileMap
http://www.dogkennels.net/filemap/

Uninstall Tool
http://xpis.alfaspace.net/index.php?id=projects&show=uninstall
 
(I'm top posting on purpose)

With due respect to jmatt, and appreciating the effort that he/she put
into this post, I'm requesting that people refrain from posting these
kinds of dragnet listings here in the future. Here's why:

In the hope of finding a decent uninstall program, I wasted an hour last
night following these links. I came away with not a single useful
uninstaller!

1. Some of these links were dead.
2. Some of these programs are not uninstallers.
3. Some of the programs were once uninstallers, but don't exist any more.
4. Most of the listings for Total Uninstall don't produce results
because the free version has been yanked by the author.
5. File Map, by Bernie Built, is not an uninstaller, but it appears to
be a very useful tool to use after your uninstaller leaves some junk
behind. This may be an exceptional find!

What I especially appreciate is answers that contain some descriptive
text from the poster about what the program does, personal experience,
suitable platforms, etc., and personal reviews. This is how I try to
post myself. And live links.

Please think about the experience of the person at the other end -- the
person who actually tries to use your post. OK?

Thanks for listening.

Richard
 
Hi Richard,
4. Most of the listings for Total Uninstall don't produce results because the
free version has been yanked by the author.

I hadn't heard that Total Uninstall had been pulled by the author.
Thanks for the head's up.

I got Total Uninstall from
http://digilander.libero.it/molearchive3/tun235.zip
and the link is still alive. I checked it on 2/28/06 at 11 PM
(Washington DC time) and it still works.

If you have any further trouble acquiring Total Uninstaller, let me
know and I'll post my copy to a website where you can download it.
What I especially appreciate is answers that contain some descriptive text
from the poster about what the program does, personal experience, suitable
platforms, etc., and personal reviews. This is how I try to post myself. And
live links.

I like Total Uninstall the best after trying out several other
uninstallers. TU gives me an itemized list of everything that was added
or changed (or deleted) during the installation and catalogs the list
into folders, files and registry entries so that I can see exactly WHAT
has happened and WHERE it happened. I can also go back later and review
those changes as desired. Uninstalling a program is very quick and
uncomplicated, and you are notified if anything couldn't be removed or
changed back and you are told exactly where it is located, whether it
is a registry entry or a file or folder.

What I REALLY LIKE about TU is that once you manually take care of the
notifications, you can run the Uninstaller feature again and VERIFY
that you got everything, and that the computer is back to normal. I
like that re-uninstall-and-verify feature ALOT---and it has saved my
butt a couple of times with a client watching the monitor over my
shoulder.

The only warning is that TU does NOT track changes made, or files
created by, programs AFTER they were installed. For example, Quickbooks
loads and Total Uninstall tracks all the changes just fine. You run
Quickbooks once to establish the registry entries and TU catches all of
that too. At some point in the future (after TU has been turned off),
Quickbooks places "quickbooks.ini" in your C:\OSgoeshere folder, and TU
does NOT record it. This is really not a big deal because it doesn't
happen with many programs---but it DID happen with Quickbooks and I had
troubles when I tried to uninstall "Quickbooks Old" and install
"Quickbooks New" and couldn't find the source of the problem after TU
showed that everything had been removed in the uninstall.

Take care bro!
 
bambam said:
Why? What has this got to do with making your point?
It's considered bad netiquette by many people to top post, probably
because it messes up the sequence of the thread contained/quoted within
the post. I usually follow that format; however, there are times when I
break this rule intentionally; for example, where I was making what
amounted to a new topic using the foregoing as the point of my new
message. See?

Looked at another way, the point of my post was not the topic of the
poster, but the fact that for practical purposes, virtually the entire
content was detritus -- and that presenting a flurry of worthless
information is worse than saying nothing: it can waste readers' time.

In this case, the poster had the best of intentions. The OP gathered up
all the links and categorized them before making his/her submission; but
posted before checking the validity of the links, nor explaining what
the content was -- making the reader do all the work with no payoff.

Richard
 
bobbysoft said:


I think that Dan (the OP) wasn't exactly clear about what he wants. At
least, I was a bit foggy when reading his query. For one thing, in my
experience, install/uninstall routines don't usually mess up data files.

Only rarely will they delete the program files themselves. Therefore, I
think that what he asked for may not be of concern, and perhaps a
standard uninstall program (like Total Uninstall [no longer freeware] or
ZSoft Uninstaller [freeware coming along nicely in development]) would
do fine. I'd put programs like this in a category that I'll call
"universal install tracker/uninstaller" software, because that's how
they work.

Inno Setup is not a consumer uninstaller. With some digging around on
the site, I was able to glean that Inno Setup is not for end users, but
is an installation packager for the programmer who has developed an
application.

It would have been helpful if the respondent had written at least part
of what I just said. After all, one assumes that when someone recommends
a solution, that he knows something about what he recommended. Right?

I would appreciate posters refraining from submitting one-liners like
this. Please, when you reply with a link, would you at least add a few
grunts of explanation as a courtesy, so that you can spare the readers
of your post the effort of having to research a dead end. In this case,
the linked page provides a lot of technical detail to wade through _and
nowhere on the linked page is there any explanation about what this
program does!_ Only by divining and clicking on an embedded link will
the reader discover, in technical language, that this is not an end user
application (what the OP had asked for), but rather, a technical tool
for the professional programmer.

Please, everyone: when you post a reply, make sure to communicate to
your human reader, at least a minimal answer in plain language as you'd
want to be replied to yourself.

Richard
 
It's considered bad netiquette by many people to top post, probably
because it messes up the sequence of the thread contained/quoted within
the post. I usually follow that format; however, there are times when I
break this rule intentionally; for example, where I was making what
amounted to a new topic using the foregoing as the point of my new
message. See?

Yes, I do see what you are trying to achieve, I just think you are going
about it in a strange way.
Looked at another way, the point of my post was not the topic of the
poster, but the fact that for practical purposes, virtually the entire
content was detritus -- and that presenting a flurry of worthless
information is worse than saying nothing: it can waste readers' time.

So why not just reply to jmatt in the thread were he tried to help you?
In this case, the poster had the best of intentions. The OP gathered up
all the links and categorized them before making his/her submission; but
posted before checking the validity of the links, nor explaining what
the content was -- making the reader do all the work with no payoff.

I think that the links would have been valid at the time jmatt made the
list, its just that over time things have changed. Sometimes you have to do
some of the work yourself.
Instead of starting a new thread complaining about jmatt's post, don't you
think it would be better to reply directly to the post, and maybe even
update a few of the links? That way you are helping, instead of
complaining.
 
In this case, the poster had the best of intentions. The OP gathered up
all the links and categorized them before making his/her submission; but
posted before checking the validity of the links, nor explaining what
the content was -- making the reader do all the work with no payoff.

That happens often in a NG where the participants are volunteering
their contributions. The contributions range from very poor to very
good. I applaud your effort at trying to get those whose contributions
don't meet your standards to improve themselves accordingly.

With a little luck you might be able to get them to improve to the
point where they make the selection for you and you won't have do any
work at all.

Really now! The nerve of some people, causing you to do more work than
you wanted to do because they were too lazy to contribute the amount
of work that you thought they should! There is just no end to rudeness
in this world :-(

If I may be so bold, may I suggest the following procedure for those
wanting to make a suggestion or recommendation to you.

1) Read the original post to be sure you understand Richard
Steinfeld's needs. Read it several times if necessary. Ask others for
help if you need to.

2) Make sure the link you are suggesting is correct and working.
Sometimes the link where you got the program has been changed. If so,
track down the correct link.

3) Make sure the program is still supported. Richard Steinfeld doesn't
want to deal with dead-end-ware. If in doubt, contact the author and
get his assurance.

4) Study the proposed freeware carefully. Make sure it meets the needs
of Richard Steinfeld. Make sure you have the correct link for
download. If there are several download sources, just give him the
link to the fastest and most reliable. Test to make sure.

5) Then and only then should you consider making the recommendation to
Richard Steinfeld. You don't want to waste any of his time. It's more
valuable than yours.

Seriously though, I do agree that higher quality posts would be nice.
I guess we get what we pay for.
 
The only warning is that TU does NOT track changes made, or files
created by, programs AFTER they were installed.

Actually it can, but it's a rare use of the program. TU is not an
installation monitor so much as it is a state monitor. It's just used
for installations. BUT, try this: within TU choose notepad for
installation, and when running notepad type "Mary had a little ..."
and save. Now close and finish with TU doing an uninstall. The
"Mary..." file will be gone, but that's it. Although you chose to
monitor notepad, it's still there.
For example, Quickbooks
loads and Total Uninstall tracks all the changes just fine. You run
Quickbooks once to establish the registry entries and TU catches all of
that too. At some point in the future (after TU has been turned off),
Quickbooks places "quickbooks.ini" in your C:\OSgoeshere folder, and TU
does NOT record it. This is really not a big deal because it doesn't
happen with many programs---but it DID happen with Quickbooks and I had
troubles when I tried to uninstall "Quickbooks Old" and install
"Quickbooks New" and couldn't find the source of the problem after TU
showed that everything had been removed in the uninstall.

I used the word "rare" above for a reason. I have been sufficiently
suspicious only a few times to have TU monitor not only the install,
but also the first two or three uses of a new program. Removing a
program then, is just doing three or four unistalls. (Most recent
first, and so on).
 
Richard Steinfeld - 01.03.2006 10:46 :
I think that Dan (the OP) wasn't exactly clear about what he wants. At

I can not found any posting of "bobbysoft"? You dont repost to any OP?
You started a new thread, why? Sorry, I can't understand your "special"
usenet-/NG-behavior.
 
With due respect to jmatt, and appreciating the effort that he/she
put into this post, I'm requesting that people refrain from
posting these kinds of dragnet listings here in the future. Here's
why:

In the hope of finding a decent uninstall program, I wasted an
hour last night following these links.

That's a pretty bad reason.

I'm requesting that you refrain from complaining about such posts
and simply stop following links from such posts.
What I especially appreciate is answers that contain some
descriptive text from the poster about what the program does,
personal experience, suitable platforms, etc., and personal
reviews.

You could try requesting that kind of info before you chase links.
 
Richard Steinfeld said:
With due respect to jmatt, and appreciating the effort that he/she put
into this post,

<snip>

From me too: Due respect and appreciation to jmatt.

Personal tastes :

I killfile the flooders. And on contrary, I've found a good number of
Jmatt's posts worth keeping. Collections of links to apps of specific
categories all conveniently consolidated to a single post.

Important :

ACF is such a very useful source of information largely because of the way
our many different types of posts work together. Posts like many of Jmatt's
which have consolidated lists of types of apps. Review posts. Very specific
posts describing how to accomplish a particular function with a certain
program. Posts (cite Susan's) that get the most accurate and updated links
and status. Posts that describe bugs, or difficulties. And so on. These
work together. In ACF, even metoo posts are of value -- when more than one
person, via followups, recommends an app -- this is yet another type of
posting which provides for us an aggregate usefulness of information.
 
I've found a good number of
Jmatt's posts worth keeping. Collections of links to apps of specific
categories all conveniently consolidated to a single post.

< snip >

Yep, if people don't like his posts then he is easy enough to
killfile.
 
ACF is such a very useful source of information largely because of the way
our many different types of posts work together. Posts like many of Jmatt's
which have consolidated lists of types of apps. Review posts. Very specific
posts describing how to accomplish a particular function with a certain
program. Posts (cite Susan's) that get the most accurate and updated links
and status. Posts that describe bugs, or difficulties. And so on. These
work together. In ACF, even metoo posts are of value -- when more than one
person, via followups, recommends an app -- this is yet another type of
posting which provides for us an aggregate usefulness of information.

I think you hit the nail squarely on the head. It's the DIVERSITY of
information available here that provides the value. How useful a
single post might be to a requestor (or reader) depends on the TYPE of
information she or he is looking for. That said, it's probably a good
idea to check that links are valid before posting a recommendation. I
try to remember to do that, but occasionally something slips by. <g>
 
Moments before spontaneously combusting Richard Steinfeld
With due respect to jmatt, and appreciating the effort that he/she put
into this post, I'm requesting that people refrain from posting these
kinds of dragnet listings here in the future.

I'm requesting people ignore this request.

These sorts of posts are a goldmine for a freeware junkie like me.
Keep 'em coming.

[Remainder snipped]
 
Back
Top