In the end, are CRT monitors bad for our health?

  • Thread starter Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps)
  • Start date


Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps)

.... was there a consensus?

@[email protected] Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux
^ ^ 21:30:01 up 5:49 0 users load average: 0.00 0.00 0.00
ä¸å€Ÿè²¸! ä¸è©é¨™! ä¸æ´äº¤! ä¸æ‰“交! ä¸æ‰“劫! ä¸è‡ªæ®º! è«‹è€ƒæ…®ç¶œæ´ (CSSA):




In message <[email protected]> Mike Huskey
In my case yes, the CRT's were a major migraine trigger.

This is usually a case of frequency, bumping the frequency from 60Hz up
to 75Hz-80Hz usually helped, monitor permitting, of course.

You'll find the odd LCD with a 60Hz backlight out there too, although
they're pretty rare these days (I haven't seen one new in years, but my
sensitivity has decreased too, so I'm not sure I'd pick one out just
walking by it unless I actually stopped to study it)



larry moe 'n curly

VanguardLH said:
You got less irradiated from a CRT than from drinking milk.

What about compared to sleeping with two women? Nuclear physicist
Edward Teller said the average man received less radiation from
nuclear power plants than from sleeping with two women. More
importantly, how well does that work as a pick-up line? (Teller didn't

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question