In Outlook 2003 how do I do a "receive only" to check incoming be.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Well, I got Outlook 2003 and there still isn't the option to receive email
without having it checked at the same time. I don't want to have to do a
work around, such as storing outgoing in a draft folder. Am I missing
something? This command seems so basic. Thanks all. R. Young
 
Might try double checking your send/receive settings (ctrl + alt + s) then
the edit button. I believe you will find checkboxes that will help you
setup a "receive" only account.
 
You can Send without receiving by using the dropdown arrow by Send/receive,
selecting your account and clicking on Inbox.
 
Thanks. At last someone has told me how to do a simple "receive only" for
accounts which I use for both sending and receiving. Ideally I would like to
do a receive only for all my email accounts in one go. Maybe too much to
ask, although it's a snap in Outlook Express.
 
Hint: you can have multiple send/receive groups.

Richard Young said:
Thanks. At last someone has told me how to do a simple "receive only" for
accounts which I use for both sending and receiving. Ideally I would like
to
do a receive only for all my email accounts in one go. Maybe too much to
ask, although it's a snap in Outlook Express.
 
That will help if groups can be groups of email accounts, and not just
people. I'll look into it. Thanks
 
Just out of curiosity, why do you *not* want to send mail when you download
mail? It would seem to me that if mail isn't ready to be sent, it really
is a draft. If you want to delay its sending to a particular time, there's
always the "do not deliver before" option in View -> Options on the
message.
 
I don't really like putting things in the drafts folder since I tend to
forget about them. And I may have something that is ready to go out, but I
want to do a last minute check to see if something has been sent to me that
would modify what I am about to send out. I guess I've gotten so used to
doing a quick 'receive only" check that it is now my habit, and I wish it
were as easy to do in Outlook as it is in OE (with the receive all command).
I can always change my habits. Seems like I have encountered others who have
this wish and have lobbied Microsoft to make it a possible, so I don't think
I am alone.
 
Jeff,

I can give you a great answer as well. I manage approximately 3 e-mail
addresses across about as many domains. Considering I'm connected to one
specific domain about 99.9% percent of the time, I only need a receive only
on 2 accounts. If I end up replying to one of those accounts and due to
some fascist ISPs, I might need to have the particular account/group held
until I'm on the "right" network. The "Receive All" would be a nice
addition for OE to Outlook users since the send/receive groups can be a bit
daunting for the first timer.
 
Richard Young said:
That will help if groups can be groups of email accounts, and not just
people. I'll look into it. Thanks

Send/receive groups are, by definition, groups of accounts.
 
I'm playing with the settings, but so far haven't found a way to create a
single group that consists of my four email accounts. If I try to add an
account to a group it bumps out the one that is in there. I'll keep at it.
 
Richard Young said:
I'm playing with the settings, but so far haven't found a way to
create a single group that consists of my four email accounts. If I
try to add an account to a group it bumps out the one that is in
there. I'll keep at it.

Tools>Send/Receive>Send/Receive Settings>Define Send/Receive Groups>New
works for me. I defined a new group, giving it the name "Receive-Only", and
clicked OK. Outlook listed all my current accounts (I have several), but
did not include any of them. I simply selected each that I wished to be in
the group and deselected the "Send mail items" (leaving the "Receive mail
items checked toi make them receive-only) for each. I then clicked OK.
Finally, on the Tools menu I clicked Send/Receive>Receive-Only. All my
accounts downloaded without sending a thing.
 
Bye Jove, this may actually work! I bow to the master. I'll have to dig into
it tomorrow to double check that it will do what I want, but it seems to.
Thank you.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top