If I'm a pree-teen, then your mother and father are still
pre-pubescent children too, making you reproductive cells that have
yet to have been produced!
Maybe you should learn how to read and comprehend a thread!
1.) Roger Bryant wrote: "I agree. The patch that fixes this has been
out for almost a month. If people haven't downloaded it yet than they
deserve to have every virus in the internet. ANy computer with an
internet connection needs a good virus scanner and a firewall (even
on a 56k dial-up), and they need to be updated (once a week, at the
very least). "
2.) kurttrail wrote in reply to Roger: "People don't derserve to get
viruses just because MS sells swiss cheese for software!"
3.) Stephen wrote in reply to me: "Check out nai.com, Linux has
viruses ready and waiting too. It's a fact of life with computers
until they design a system that doesn't allow buffer overruns etc.
Even then, so many people will open anything that arrives attached to
an email. e.g. look at this.. viruses for Win32, Linux, Cisco, IRC .
Windows suffers most but then Microsoft is widely distributed and
there's more bang for the virus buck targeting Windows:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/newly-discovered-viruses.asp"
4.) kurttrail wrote in reply to Stephen: "So that means that people
deserve to get viruses?"
So did Stephen's reply to me make any sense in light of what I had
written in response to Roger?
