K
Kimmo
I have just purchased a cheap HP PSC 1315 device, and printed out a
couple of photos. First, I forgot to put in the HP photo cartridge
(No. 58), so the printer was using standard three-color and black
catridges (No. 56 & 57). Then I replaced the black cartridge with the
photo cartridge, and printed the same photo with cartridges No. 57 &
58. Both prints were produced on 10x15cm HP premium plus photo paper
(280g/m2). There was very little difference on the quality of these
prints (both were good enough for me). This brought up couple of
questions on my mind:
Was the cartridge No. 57 consumed equally in both examples, or was it
consumed less in the second example as some of the ink came from the
second color cartridge (No. 58)? In the other words, is the second
color cartridge just extra ink consumption when used, or is the
concumption balanced between the two cartridges? Was one of these
prints more expensive than the other? Does the second print last
longer than the first one? Is there any other reason than the quality
that photos should not be printed without the photo cartridge?
I also have one heavy-duty HP Inkjet printer, which I use to make
regular document prints etc. So this new printer will mostly be for
printing photos, posters and other color stuff, directly from camera
and otherwise. Maybe only occasionally some document pages. Would you
therefore recommend me to permanently keep in two color cartridges
(No. 57 & 58), or keep switching to No. 56 (black) when regular paper
prints are being made? Switching is really pain in the ass as it
re-calibrates the cartridges everytime you make a switch. As I said,
most - if not all - of the prints will be in color, but not all will
be printed on photo paper.
Thanks in advance for your expert answers.
couple of photos. First, I forgot to put in the HP photo cartridge
(No. 58), so the printer was using standard three-color and black
catridges (No. 56 & 57). Then I replaced the black cartridge with the
photo cartridge, and printed the same photo with cartridges No. 57 &
58. Both prints were produced on 10x15cm HP premium plus photo paper
(280g/m2). There was very little difference on the quality of these
prints (both were good enough for me). This brought up couple of
questions on my mind:
Was the cartridge No. 57 consumed equally in both examples, or was it
consumed less in the second example as some of the ink came from the
second color cartridge (No. 58)? In the other words, is the second
color cartridge just extra ink consumption when used, or is the
concumption balanced between the two cartridges? Was one of these
prints more expensive than the other? Does the second print last
longer than the first one? Is there any other reason than the quality
that photos should not be printed without the photo cartridge?
I also have one heavy-duty HP Inkjet printer, which I use to make
regular document prints etc. So this new printer will mostly be for
printing photos, posters and other color stuff, directly from camera
and otherwise. Maybe only occasionally some document pages. Would you
therefore recommend me to permanently keep in two color cartridges
(No. 57 & 58), or keep switching to No. 56 (black) when regular paper
prints are being made? Switching is really pain in the ass as it
re-calibrates the cartridges everytime you make a switch. As I said,
most - if not all - of the prints will be in color, but not all will
be printed on photo paper.
Thanks in advance for your expert answers.