how is a 9700 to a 9800 pro in performance

  • Thread starter wired and confused
  • Start date
W

wired and confused

how close is the 9700 pro to a 9800 pro in performance is there a big gap?
 
A

Augustus

wired and confused said:
how close is the 9700 pro to a 9800 pro in performance is there a big gap?
About 10% according to most of the benching I've seen. They're still an
excellent card.
 
D

DaveW

The 9700 is NOT DX9 capable. The 9800 is. If you want to play newer games
you'll want the 9800.
 
L

Les

DaveW said:
The 9700 is NOT DX9 capable.

Say what now? If it were not DirectX9 capable I would not be able to
complete the DX9 tests in 3dmark 03 would I?

Please explain.
 
G

GTD

Well looking at this table from Tomshardware.com:
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031229/index.html
The only 2 differences are the GPU and RAM speeds the 9800 pro has an extra
55Mhz on the GPU and 80Mhz on the ram.

wrong, they use different GPU's. There are differences in their
function, although I'm not exactly sure what they are off hand.



You should start drinking prune juice and KY jelly cocktails right now,
that will make things a lot smoother.
-Felatio Love
 
A

Augustus

DaveW said:
The 9700 is NOT DX9 capable. The 9800 is. If you want to play newer games
you'll want the 9800.

Glad to see I'm not the only one who screws up sometime. 9700 series all
fully DX9. 9700 Pro has an RV300 GPU, the 9800 has RV350. Different
transistor count, architecture. And like I said, about 8-10% slower.
 
K

Ken Maltby

Augustus said:
Glad to see I'm not the only one who screws up sometime. 9700 series all
fully DX9. 9700 Pro has an RV300 GPU, the 9800 has RV350. Different
transistor count, architecture. And like I said, about 8-10% slower.


Actually the 9700Pro is easily overclocked to 9800Pro speeds
(Core=378 Mem=337.5)

One real difference is the 9700Pro is 1.1 Pixel Shader and the
9800Pro is 2.0; there may be other differences but they seem to
have little if any impact on what the card can run.

Luck;
Ken
 
A

Augustus

Actually the 9700Pro is easily overclocked to 9800Pro speeds
(Core=378 Mem=337.5)

One real difference is the 9700Pro is 1.1 Pixel Shader and the
9800Pro is 2.0; there may be other differences but they seem to
have little if any impact on what the card can run.

Luck;
K

True, but if you overclock the 9800 Pro by the same amount it's still about
10% faster. A person who overclocks will overclock everything....even an
9800XT. So the 9700 Pro is still going to be a bit slower. I'd be perfectly
happy with either.
 
A

Augustus

Glad to see I'm not the only one who screws up sometime. 9700 series all
fully DX9. 9700 Pro has an RV300 GPU, the 9800 has RV350. Different
transistor count, architecture. And like I said, about 8-10% slower.

And I screwed up here....that should read R300 and R350....the RV350 is the
9600 core.
 
P

Pluvious

The 9700 is NOT DX9 capable. The 9800 is. If you want to play newer games
you'll want the 9800.

I've corrected you already on this matter. The 9700 PRO is a Direct X
9 capable card, the first as a mater of fact.

Pluvious
 
P

Pluvious

Actually the 9700Pro is easily overclocked to 9800Pro speeds
(Core=378 Mem=337.5)

One real difference is the 9700Pro is 1.1 Pixel Shader and the
9800Pro is 2.0; there may be other differences but they seem to
have little if any impact on what the card can run.

Luck;
Ken

The drivers I use enable Pixel Shader 2.0. Omega's 4.5's. And my
overclock is currently 378/324. The difference is minor between the
9700 and 9800.

Pluvious
 
B

Bandit

Actually the 9700Pro is easily overclocked to 9800Pro speeds
(Core=378 Mem=337.5)

One real difference is the 9700Pro is 1.1 Pixel Shader and the
9800Pro is 2.0; there may be other differences but they seem to
have little if any impact on what the card can run.

Luck;
Ken

If you're talking about smartshader the 9700pro is 2.0 to
 
J

J. Clarke

Augustus said:
And I screwed up here....that should read R300 and R350....the RV350 is
the 9600 core.

Not really a different architecture. Just an added feature--they increased
the instruction depth for the pixel shader.
 
J

J. Clarke

FWIW, if you review DaveW's posting history you'll find that he didn't
"screw up", he's either trolling or denser than concrete because he's been
corrected on this point hundreds of times and continues to post this
garbage. Sometimes I think he's a bot set up to autoreply to posts
containing "9700" and "DX9" with his message.
 
K

Kill Bill

No shit. WTF is the deal? Geez....

J. Clarke said:
FWIW, if you review DaveW's posting history you'll find that he didn't
"screw up", he's either trolling or denser than concrete because he's been
corrected on this point hundreds of times and continues to post this
garbage. Sometimes I think he's a bot set up to autoreply to posts
containing "9700" and "DX9" with his message.
 
K

KCB

DaveW said:
The 9700 is NOT DX9 capable. The 9800 is.

OMG, roflmao!! Come on DaveW!! One more time!!

Let's see....um... 9700 9800 DX9 ...Will that get the auto reply?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top