I Impmon May 25, 2007 #21 That's the sound of me chickening out. I just bought a SCSI drive to avoid the potential ATA issues. Click to expand... And SCSI are easier how? Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, deal with proper termination, and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict.
That's the sound of me chickening out. I just bought a SCSI drive to avoid the potential ATA issues. Click to expand... And SCSI are easier how? Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, deal with proper termination, and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict.
H Howard Kaikow May 25, 2007 #22 Impmon said: And SCSI are easier how? Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, deal with proper termination, and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict. Click to expand... I've been using SCSI for years, it is easy.
Impmon said: And SCSI are easier how? Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, deal with proper termination, and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict. Click to expand... I've been using SCSI for years, it is easy.
F Folkert Rienstra May 25, 2007 #23 And SCSI are easier how? Click to expand... Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, Click to expand... 1.5 meters is plenty for 4 harddrives. deal with proper termination, Click to expand... He obviously already has. and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict. Click to expand... Like you don't have to do that with ATA. Wotunidjut.
And SCSI are easier how? Click to expand... Unlike ATA, you got to watch the length more closely, Click to expand... 1.5 meters is plenty for 4 harddrives. deal with proper termination, Click to expand... He obviously already has. and set the SCSI ID to avoid conflict. Click to expand... Like you don't have to do that with ATA. Wotunidjut.
