SlowJet wrote:
AWWWWWW, at long last. A FW brother!

I KNEW I WAS NOT ALONE on this forsaken plaent. LOL
Carey wrote:
...Attempting to use two firewalls
will not afford any additional protection<<<<
SlowJet wrote:
Not True.

Without knowning the specs of each FW, this is only a RoT. Once
the specs are known, several FW's could be used to protect (and allow)
different activity, at different times and stages and states.
SlowJet:
Your last comment is absolutely correct. I have been posting this for
sometime in this NG w/o causing the major respondents (incl MVPs) to
challenge their uneducated opinion via personal testing and study of
TCP/IP-firewalls. If a user understands TCP/IP and firewalling, he/she has
your opinion, otherwise he/she listens to Steve Gibson, MS, or MVPs in this
NG.
If the MVPs had to take a test on firewalls (and TCP/IP?), the results would
be interesting. Or predictable!